Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Rr2 plus Enterobacter B had some negative growth effects in Parbat.

A claim from Coinoculation of chickpea with Rhizobium isolates from roots and nodules and phytohormone-producing Enterobacter strains · 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rr2 plus Enterobacter B had some negative growth effects in Parbat.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Material
cv. Parbate0
Treatment
coinoculated with Rhizobium strain Rr2 and Enterobacter strain Be0
Interactor
Rhizobium strain Rr2e0symbiont
Second interactor
Enterobacter strain Be0symbiont
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
negative effectse0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“some negative effects on plant growth were also noted in cv. Parbat coinoculated with Rhizobium strain Rr2 and Enterobacter strain B.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1977–2110
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–183

Title

Coinoculation of chickpea with Rhizobium isolates from roots and nodules and phytohormone-producing Enterobacter strains

Babur Saeed Mirza; M. Sajjad Mirza; Asghari Bano; et al. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 2007. doi:10.1071/ea06151

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-7bf3d8c4d3bf309f06542d724aaee40cb3d0fd38d5b52c80083d2d5e039b597c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 15 in the model’s answer

Rhizobium · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 45 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 44 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Single Rhizobium inoculation promoted chickpea growth somewhat.

    Growth, nutrient uptake and yield parameters of chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.) enhance byRhizobiumandAzotobacterinoculations in saline soil · 2019

    Opposite directionCites this paper

  2. positive
    Single, dual, and triple bacterial inoculations significantly increased plant height versus control in controlled and field trials.

    Influence of Nitrogen Fixing and Phosphorus Solubilizing Bacteria on the Nodulation, Plant Growth, and Yield of Chickpea · 2007 · compared with control treatment

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    Rhizobium inoculation alone significantly enhanced chickpea growth.

    The Combined Effects of Gibberellic Acid and Rhizobium on Growth, Yield and Nutritional Status in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) · 2021

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Rhizobium + PSB inoculation was the most effective microbial inoculant for shoot dry weight in chickpea

    Effect ofRhizobiumand Phosphate Solubilizing Bacterial Inoculants on Symbiotic Traits, Nodule Leghemoglobin, and Yield of Chickpea Genotypes · 2013 · compared with microbial inoculants

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Inoculation with Rhizobium strains increased shoot dry matter by 17% over uninoculated plants.

    Effect of chickpea in association with Rhizobium to crop productivity and soil fertility · 2016 · compared with uninoculated plants

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Rhizobium significantly increased chickpea growth with and without nematodes.

    Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria, nematode parasitic fungi and root-nodule bacterium on root-knot nematodesMeloidogyne javanicaand growth of chickpea · 2009

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    The combined treatments significantly increased chickpea growth and dry weight versus control.

    Effect of phosphorus, Sulphur and biofertilizers on growth attributes and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) · 2018 · compared with control /un-inoculated

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Rhizobium inoculation significantly increased plant dry weight by 15.59, 14.25 and 1.90 per cent at 45, 75 and 120 DAS.

    Effectiveness of micronutrient application and Rhizobium inoculation on growth and yield of Chickpea · 2012

    Opposite direction

37 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

inoculation · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

152 papers: 135 positive, 17 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this claim · 134 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Bacterial inoculation significantly increased chickpea growth, shoot phosphorus and nitrogen, nodulation and nitrogenase activity.

    Phosphorus uptake and growth promotion of chickpea by co-inoculation of mineral phosphate solubilising bacteria and a mixed rhizobial culture · 2004

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
    Inoculation with O. ciceri alone or with M. ciceri produced 31% more chickpea biomass than uninoculated controls.

    Differential response of kabuli and desi chickpea genotypes toward inoculation with PGPR in different soils · 2015 · compared with non-inoculated controls

    Opposite directionCites this paper

  3. positive
    Rhizobial inoculation improved shoot dry weight (SDW) by +7.67 g plant −1 under sub‐humid conditions.

    Effect of bio‐fertilization and edapho‐climatic conditions on chickpea nodulation, grain yields, and seed protein in a Mediterranean context: a meta‐analysis approach · 2026

    Opposite directionCites this paper

  4. positive
    Co-inoculation with Rhizobia and Azotobacter enhanced measured chickpea traits except seed germination.

    EFFECTS OF RHIZOBIA AND AZOTOBACTER ON YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.) · 2023

    Opposite directionCites this paper

  5. positive
    Single, dual, and triple bacterial inoculations significantly increased plant height versus control in controlled and field trials.

    Influence of Nitrogen Fixing and Phosphorus Solubilizing Bacteria on the Nodulation, Plant Growth, and Yield of Chickpea · 2007 · compared with control treatment

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Rhizobacterial treatment increased chickpea biomass under drought.

    Synergistic effect of Pseudomonas putida and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens ameliorates drought stress in chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.) · 2015

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    Combined PGR and PGPR increased chickpea leaf area.

    Effects of exogenously applied plant growth regulators in combination with PGPR on the physiology and root growth of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) and their role in drought tolerance · 2018

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Trichoderma inoculation increased chickpea shoot and root growth and biomass.

    Phosphate solubilization potential and phosphatase activity of rhizospheric Trichoderma spp. · 2010

    Opposite direction

143 papers more in this group

See all 152 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.