Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Rhizobacterial treatment increased chickpea biomass under drought.

A claim from Synergistic effect of Pseudomonas putida and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens ameliorates drought stress in chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.) · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobacterial treatment increased chickpea biomass under drought.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
PGPR individually or in consortiae0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher biomass and reversal of stress indicators in chickpea cultivars treated with PGPR individually or in consortia.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1590

Title

Synergistic effect of Pseudomonas putida and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens ameliorates drought stress in chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)

Manoj Kumar; Sankalp Mishra; Vijaykant Dixit; et al. Plant Signaling & Behavior 2015. doi:10.1080/15592324.2015.1071004

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-a7bdd61362fe1e18f146110c4ec9c40ad61c515ea4bf7f5ed19ba30e36d0b026 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

inoculation · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

152 papers: 135 positive, 17 negative or no effect

134 papers in the same direction as this claim · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Burkholderia sp. 12F inoculation increased chickpea growth with rock phosphate fertilization.

    Is phosphate solubilizing ability in plant growth‐promoting rhizobacteria isolated from chickpea linked to their ability to produce ACC deaminase? · 2021

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. negative
    Rhizobacterial seed and soil treatment delayed chickpea seedling emergence relative to controls.

    Influence of temperature on plant–rhizobacteria interactions related to biocontrol potential for suppression of fusarium wilt of chickpea · 2004 · compared with nontreated controls

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    S. rolfsii inoculation alone gave the lowest chickpea shoot and root dry biomass.

    Effect of soil amendment with Chenopodium album dry biomass and two Trichoderma species on growth of chickpea var. Noor 2009 in Sclerotium rolfsii contaminated soil · 2020 · compared with without any soil amendment

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Inoculation with non-AM fungal endophytes had a neutral effect on chickpea biomass.

    Genotypic variation in the response of chickpea to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and non-mycorrhizal fungal endophytes · 2018

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    S. rolfsii reduced shoot dry weight by 21.4% versus negative control.

    ALLEVIATING STRESS OF SCLERTIUM ROLFSII ON GROWTH OF CHICKPEA VAR. BHAKKAR-2011 BY TRICHODERMA HARZIANUM AND T. VIRIDE · 2021 · compared with negative control

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Combined nematode and fungal inocula had an additive effect on chickpea growth.

    Interaction of root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita with Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Ciceri and F. solani on chickpea1 · 1987

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Rhizobium inoculation did not significantly change intercepted total radiation or radiation use efficiency of chickpea compared with the non-inoculated control.

    Growth and yield response of chickpea to Rhizobium inoculation: productivity in relation to interception of radiation · 2015 · compared with non-inoculated control

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Inoculated chickpea showed no increase in measured growth and development traits.

    Growth and development responses of some legume species inoculated with a mycorrhiza-based biofertilizer · 2010

    Opposite direction

143 papers more in this group

See all 152 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.