Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Liquid Mesorhizobium inoculants gave a significant 35.1% increase in nodule number over carrier-based inoculants in chickpea.

A claim from Performance of Liquid and Carrier-based Inoculants of Mesorhizobium ciceri and PGPR (Pseudomonas diminuta) in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) on Nodulation, Yield and Soil properties · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Liquid Mesorhizobium inoculants gave a significant 35.1% increase in nodule number over carrier-based inoculants in chickpea.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Liquid inoculants of Mesorhizobium sp.e1
Interactor
Mesorhizobium ciceriMesorhizobium cicerit0symbiont
Outcome
nodule numbere1
Direction
significant increasese1
Value
35. 1e1
Comparator
carrier-based inoculantse1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mesorhizobium ciceri and PGPR (Pseudomonas diminuta) in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–139
e1

“Liquid inoculants of Mesorhizobium sp. and PGPR indicated better nodulation than their carrier-based inoculants registering significant increases of 35. 1 and 30. 9% in nodule number and numerical increases of 25. 9 and 2. 7% in nodule dry weight at 60 days crop age, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–514

Title

Performance of Liquid and Carrier-based Inoculants of Mesorhizobium ciceri and PGPR (Pseudomonas diminuta) in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) on Nodulation, Yield and Soil properties

Pratibha Sahai; Ramesh Chandra Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 2011

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-bc645e56c6b83ea920405e0b344fe9ed5bc62f824f09754b7c74a4a1600f14fa · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

Mesorhizobium · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

22 papers: 22 positive, 0 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

114 papers: 110 positive, 4 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

105 papers more in this group

See all 114 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.