Paper · 2005 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Putrescine Increases Floral Retention, Pod Set and Seed Yield in Cold Stressed Chickpea

H. Nayyar

17
claims
37
verbatim quotes
48
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.) is sensitive to cold stress (<8 °C) at its reproductive phase that results in flower abortion, poor pod set and thus reduced yield. Early maturing genotypes are especially more sensitive. In this crop, the metabolic causes underlying cold injury that are imperative to induce cold tolerance are not known. In the present study, the endogenous levels of putrescine (diamine), spermidine (triamine) and spermine (tetramine) were examined in early maturing chickpea genotype ICCV 96029, subjected to chilling temperatures of field (12–15/4–6 °C; average maximum and minimum temperature respectively), at flowering or early podding stage. These were compared with controls growing in warmer conditions (28/12 °C) of the glasshouse. The polyamine levels increased six to nine times because of stress. Relatively, putrescine (PUT) elevation was the highest but short‐lived and its decrease appeared to match with the onset of flower and pod abscission in stressed plants. Compared with controls, chilling injury, observed as electrolyte leakage (EL), increased by 60 % while cellular respiration declined by 68 % in stressed plants. Exogenous application of 10 m m PUT to stressed plants reduced the EL by 29 % and elevated the cellular respiration by 40 %. PUT application at flowering stage resulted in increase of 30, 31, 23 and 25 % in floral retention, pod set, pod retention and fertile pods respectively. At the early podding stage, PUT treatment increased the seed yield per plant, seed number per 100 pods and individual seed weight by 50, 17 and 19 % respectively. The number of single‐seeded pods per plant increased from 4.4 in stressed plants to 12.2 in PUT‐treated plants while the number of double‐seeded pods reduced from 6.2 to 4.3. The number of infertile pods declined from 8.2 in stressed plants to 3.1 in PUT‐treated plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cold stress increased polyamine levels six to ninefold in chickpea.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
cold stresse1
Outcome
polyamine levelse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
six to nine timese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The polyamine levels increased six to nine times because of stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–834 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.) is sensitive to cold stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Putrescine rose the most under cold stress but its elevation was short lived.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Material
ICCV 96029e1
Outcome
putrescine (PUT) elevatione0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
short‐livede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“putrescine (PUT) elevation was the highest but short‐lived”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–906 · show in text ↑
e1

“early maturing chickpea genotype ICCV 96029”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–522 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The decline in putrescine appeared to coincide with flower and pod abscission under stress.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume2
Material
ICCV 96029e2
Compound
putrescine (PUT)e1
Outcome
flower and pod abscissione0
Qualifier
appeared to matche0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its decrease appeared to match with the onset of flower and pod abscission in stressed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1004 · show in text ↑
e1

“putrescine (PUT) elevation was the highest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–890 · show in text ↑
e2

“early maturing chickpea genotype ICCV 96029”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–522 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilling increased electrolyte leakage by 60% versus controls.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
chilling injurye0
Outcome
electrolyte leakage (EL)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
60 %e0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with controls, chilling injury, observed as electrolyte leakage (EL), increased by 60 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1102 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilling reduced cellular respiration by 68% versus controls.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume2
Treatment
chilling injurye1
Outcome
cellular respiratione0
Direction
declinede0
Value
68 %e0
Comparator
controlse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cellular respiration declined by 68 % in stressed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1165 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with controls, chilling injury”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1045 · show in text ↑
e2

“Chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Putrescine application reduced electrolyte leakage by 29% in stressed plants.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
Exogenous application of 10 m m PUTe0
Outcome
ELe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
29 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exogenous application of 10 m m PUT to stressed plants reduced the EL by 29 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1244 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Putrescine application increased cellular respiration by 40% in stressed plants.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
Exogenous application of 10 m m PUTe0
Outcome
cellular respiratione0
Direction
elevatede0
Value
40 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exogenous application of 10 m m PUT to stressed plants reduced the EL by 29 % and elevated the cellular respiration by 40 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1290 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Putrescine increased floral retention by 30% when applied at flowering.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
PUT application at flowering stagee0
Outcome
floral retentione0
Direction
increasee0
Value
30e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PUT application at flowering stage resulted in increase of 30, 31, 23 and 25 % in floral retention, pod set, pod retention and fertile pods respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1444 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Putrescine increased pod set by 31% when applied at flowering.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
PUT application at flowering stagee0
Outcome
pod sete0
Direction
increasee0
Value
31e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PUT application at flowering stage resulted in increase of 30, 31, 23 and 25 % in floral retention, pod set, pod retention and fertile pods respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1444 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Putrescine increased pod retention by 23% when applied at flowering.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
PUT application at flowering stagee0
Outcome
pod retentione0
Direction
increasee0
Value
23e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PUT application at flowering stage resulted in increase of 30, 31, 23 and 25 % in floral retention, pod set, pod retention and fertile pods respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1444 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Putrescine increased fertile pods by 25% when applied at flowering.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
PUT application at flowering stagee0
Outcome
fertile podse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
25 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PUT application at flowering stage resulted in increase of 30, 31, 23 and 25 % in floral retention, pod set, pod retention and fertile pods respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1444 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Putrescine at early podding increased seed yield per plant by 50%.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume1
Organ / stage
early podding stagee0
Treatment
PUT treatmente0
Outcome
seed yield per plante0
Direction
increasede0
Value
50e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the early podding stage, PUT treatment increased the seed yield per plant, seed number per 100 pods and individual seed weight by 50, 17 and 19 % respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1607 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Putrescine at early podding increased seed number per 100 pods by 17%.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume1
Organ / stage
early podding stagee0
Treatment
PUT treatmente0
Outcome
seed number per 100 podse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
17e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the early podding stage, PUT treatment increased the seed yield per plant, seed number per 100 pods and individual seed weight by 50, 17 and 19 % respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1607 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Putrescine at early podding increased individual seed weight by 19%.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume1
Organ / stage
early podding stagee0
Treatment
PUT treatmente0
Outcome
individual seed weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
19 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the early podding stage, PUT treatment increased the seed yield per plant, seed number per 100 pods and individual seed weight by 50, 17 and 19 % respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1607 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Putrescine increased single-seeded pods from 4.4 to 12.2 per plant.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
PUT‐treated plantse0
Outcome
single‐seeded pods per plante0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12.2e0
Qualifier
4.4e0
Comparator
stressed plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of single‐seeded pods per plant increased from 4.4 in stressed plants to 12.2 in PUT‐treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1609–1719 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Putrescine reduced double-seeded pods from 6.2 to 4.3 per plant.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
PUT‐treated plantse2
Outcome
double‐seeded podse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
4.3e0
Qualifier
6.2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the number of double‐seeded pods reduced from 6.2 to 4.3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1726–1782 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–39 · show in text ↑
e2

“to 12.2 in PUT‐treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1690–1719 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Putrescine reduced infertile pods from 8.2 to 3.1 per plant.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
PUT‐treated plantse0
Outcome
infertile podse0
Direction
declinede0
Value
3.1e0
Qualifier
8.2e0
Comparator
stressed plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of infertile pods declined from 8.2 in stressed plants to 3.1 in PUT‐treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1784–1878 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–39 · show in text ↑

putrescine · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

cold · molecular: metabolites · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 1 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

stage · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 42 positive, 5 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

cold · physiology: respiration · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

cold · physiology: oxidative · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

11 papers: 0 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.