Paper · 2021 · Turkish Journal Of Field Crops

PHYSIOLOGICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL RESPONSES OF CHICKPEA GENOTYPES TO DIFFERENT MOISTURE STRESS IN BANGLADESH

An Md. Anamul KARİM; Uttam Kumer SARKER; Ahmed Khairul HASAN; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Moisture stress influence seed germination, growth including physiological, biochemical attributes and yield of chickpea. Genotypes may vary in their capacity to tolerate moisture stress. Therefore, the study was undertaken to evaluate physiological and biochemical responses of selected chickpea genotypes in the drought prone ecosystems. The experiment was carried out at the Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Gazipur Bangladesh during 2017 and 2018. The experiment was laid out in Complete Randomized Design (CRD) with four chickpea genotypes and eleven moisture regimes. Relative water content and carotenoids content significantly decreased when stress imposed until pod formation stage. Moisture stress imposed during pre-flowering stage significantly decreased chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b content. Proline accumulation was higher in BD-6048compared to other genotypes under all moisture stress conditions. Phosphorus, potassium and protein content were lower under moisture stress until pod formation stage. Under moisture stress conditions the genotypes BD-6048 gave the highest yield compared to other genotypes. Moisture stress until pre flowering and pod formation stage reduced seed yield more severe than that on flowering stage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Moisture stress until pod formation significantly decreased relative water content and carotenoids content in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
stress imposed until pod formation stagee0
Outcome
Relative water content and carotenoids contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CHICKPEA GENOTYPES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“Relative water content and carotenoids content significantly decreased when stress imposed until pod formation stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–701 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Moisture stress during the pre-flowering stage significantly decreased chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b content in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Moisture stress imposed during pre-flowering stagee1
Outcome
chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b contente1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CHICKPEA GENOTYPES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“Moisture stress imposed during pre-flowering stage significantly decreased chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–817 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype BD-6048 accumulated more proline than other genotypes under all moisture stress conditions.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
BD-6048e2
Treatment
moisture stress conditionse2
Outcome
Proline accumulatione2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
other genotypese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CHICKPEA GENOTYPES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–61 · show in text ↑
e2

“Proline accumulation was higher in BD-6048compared to other genotypes under all moisture stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–925 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moisture stress until pod formation lowered phosphorus, potassium and protein content in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
moisture stress until pod formation stagee3
Outcome
Phosphorus, potassium and protein contente3
Direction
lowere3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CHICKPEA GENOTYPES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–61 · show in text ↑
e3

“Phosphorus, potassium and protein content were lower under moisture stress until pod formation stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1027 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under moisture stress genotype BD-6048 gave the highest yield compared with other genotypes.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
BD-6048e4
Treatment
Under moisture stress conditionse4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
higheste4
Comparator
other genotypese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CHICKPEA GENOTYPES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–61 · show in text ↑
e4

“Under moisture stress conditions the genotypes BD-6048 gave the highest yield compared to other genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moisture stress until pre-flowering and pod formation reduced seed yield more severely than stress at flowering.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Moisture stress until pre flowering and pod formation stagee5
Outcome
seed yielde5
Direction
reducede5
Qualifier
more severee5
Comparator
flowering stagee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CHICKPEA GENOTYPES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–61 · show in text ↑
e5

“Moisture stress until pre flowering and pod formation stage reduced seed yield more severe than that on flowering stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1255 · show in text ↑

drought · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

11 papers: 5 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

drought · physiology: pigments · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

17 papers: 2 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

drought · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

54 papers: 11 positive, 43 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

stage · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 42 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.