Paper · 2013

Effect of Skipping One Irrigation and Potassium Fertilization on Growth and Yield of Chickpea Plants

Nabila Zaki; Amal G. Ahmed; Magda H. Mohamed

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Two field experiments were conducted at El Rayyan region, Fayoum Governorate, Egypt, during the two successive winter seasons of 2010/2011and 2011/2012 to study the effect of application of potassium fertilizer levels (0, 50 and 75 kg K O/faddan, one faddan = 0.42 ha) under skipping one irrigation (3 or 4 2 rd th irrigation) on growth and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cv. Giza 3. The main findings of this study showed that skipping one irrigation or increasing potassium fertilizer levels led to significant reduction in all characters under study in both seasons (plant height, total dry weight /plant, number of branches/plant, number of capsules/plant, dry weight of capsules/plant and dry weight of leaves/plant at 115 days after sowing. Skipping the 3 or 4 irrigation led to declined in weight of capsules/plant, seed yield/plant, shelling%, seed rd th index, seed, straw and biological yields /faddan. Meanwhile, application of potassium induced stimulating effect on yield and its components under the present study and the rate of 75 Kg K O/faddan increased all characters 2 under this study i.e. weight of capsules/plant, seed yield/plant, shelling % seed index, seed, straw and biological yields. It is clear from the results that skipping the 3 or 4 irrigation led to reduction in protein and rd th carbohydrate percentages compared with the control, while there was a significant increase in protein and carbohydrate percentages of chickpea seed due to application of potassium fertilization. The interaction between skipping irrigation and potassium fertilizer levels was significant in all characters under study and the best treatment was 75kg K O /faddan with normal irrigation. 2

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Skipping one irrigation significantly reduced chickpea growth characters in both seasons.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Material
Giza 3e1
Treatment
skipping one irrigatione0
Outcome
plant height, total dry weight /plant, number of branches/plante0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“skipping one irrigation or increasing potassium fertilizer levels led to significant reduction in all characters under study in both seasons (plant height, total dry weight /plant, number of branches/plant, number of capsules/plant, dry weight of capsules/plant and dry weight of leaves/plant at 115 days after sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–753 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cv. Giza 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–390 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing potassium fertilizer levels significantly reduced the listed growth characters in both seasons.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
increasing potassium fertilizer levelse0
Outcome
plant height, total dry weight /plante0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“skipping one irrigation or increasing potassium fertilizer levels led to significant reduction in all characters under study in both seasons (plant height, total dry weight /plant, number of branches/plant, number of capsules/plant, dry weight of capsules/plant and dry weight of leaves/plant at 115 days after sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–753 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cv. Giza 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–390 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Skipping the third or fourth irrigation decreased chickpea capsule weight, seed yield and shelling percentage.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
Skipping the 3 or 4 irrigatione0
Outcome
weight of capsules/plant, seed yield/plant, shelling%e0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Skipping the 3 or 4 irrigation led to declined in weight of capsules/plant, seed yield/plant, shelling%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–858 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cv. Giza 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–390 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Skipping the third or fourth irrigation decreased seed index and seed, straw and biological yields.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
Skipping the 3 or 4 irrigatione0
Outcome
seed rd th index, seed, straw and biological yields /faddane0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Skipping the 3 or 4 irrigation led to declined in weight of capsules/plant, seed yield/plant, shelling%, seed rd th index, seed, straw and biological yields /faddan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–919 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cv. Giza 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–390 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium application stimulated capsule weight, seed yield and shelling percentage, with 75 Kg K O/faddan increasing these traits.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
75 Kg K O/faddane0
Outcome
weight of capsules/plant, seed yield/plant, shelling %e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of potassium induced stimulating effect on yield and its components under the present study and the rate of 75 Kg K O/faddan increased all characters 2 under this study i.e. weight of capsules/plant, seed yield/plant, shelling %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1172 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cv. Giza 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–390 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium at 75 Kg K O/faddan increased seed index and seed, straw and biological yields.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
75 Kg K O/faddane0
Outcome
seed index, seed, straw and biological yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rate of 75 Kg K O/faddan increased all characters 2 under this study i.e. weight of capsules/plant, seed yield/plant, shelling % seed index, seed, straw and biological yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1218 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cv. Giza 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–390 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Skipping the third or fourth irrigation reduced chickpea seed protein and carbohydrate percentages versus control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume2
Treatment
skipping the 3 or 4 irrigatione0
Outcome
protein and rd th carbohydrate percentagese0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“skipping the 3 or 4 irrigation led to reduction in protein and rd th carbohydrate percentages compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1373 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1457–1470 · show in text ↑
e2

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cv. Giza 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–390 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium fertilization significantly increased chickpea seed protein and carbohydrate percentages.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
application of potassium fertilizatione0
Outcome
protein and carbohydrate percentages of chickpea seede0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant increase in protein and carbohydrate percentages of chickpea seed due to application of potassium fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1516 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The irrigation by potassium interaction was significant across all studied characters.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
skipping irrigation and potassium fertilizer levelse0
Outcome
all characters under studye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction between skipping irrigation and potassium fertilizer levels was significant in all characters under study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1518–1639 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cv. Giza 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–390 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium at 75kg K O /faddan with normal irrigation was the best treatment.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
75kg K O /faddan with normal irrigatione0
Outcome
best treatmente0
Direction
beste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the best treatment was 75kg K O /faddan with normal irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1644–1706 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cv. Giza 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–390 · show in text ↑

irrigation · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 48 positive, 2 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

fertilization · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 99 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 99 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

irrigation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

124 papers: 113 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 113 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

120 papers more in this group

See all 124 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.