Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Intercropping significantly reduced stemborer larvae and pupae on maize.

A claim from Effects of intercropping on maize stemborers and their natural enemies · 1996

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping significantly reduced stemborer larvae and pupae on maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
intercrope2
Interactor
lepidopteran stemborerse1pest
Outcome
larvae and pupaee2
Direction
significantly fewere2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The effects of maize–cowpea intercropping on three lepidopteran stemborers ( Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) C. orichalcociliellus (Strand) and Sesamia calamistis Hampson) and their natural enemies were studied in Kenya”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–222
e2

“Oviposition was not affected by intercropping, but significantly fewer larvae and pupae were found in the intercrop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–339

Title

Effects of intercropping on maize stemborers and their natural enemies

Henrik Skovgård; Peeter Päts Bulletin of Entomological Research 1996. doi:10.1017/s0007485300039407

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-ae80d1dfa95415cbf0ca3228077362490f3a84e48ce30c730ddc324bf944d6d4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

intercropping · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 31 positive, 7 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.