Claim · model-written summary
The tillage by nutrient level interaction was non-significant for soil microbial studies, enzymatic activity and weed parameters.
- Treatment
- tillage and nutrient levelse1
- Outcome
- soil microbial studies, enzymatic activity, weed parameterse1
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede1
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The interaction effect due to tillage and nutrient levels on soil microbial studies, enzymatic activity, weed parameters, quality parameters, soil physico-chemical parameters, and energy indices was found non- significant”
t0“Maize”
Title
Parangi Naveen; K. Akhil; Y. Siva Lakshmi; et al. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change 2023. doi:10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i123666
Other claims from this paper (17)
- Intervention effect Residue incorporation with microbial consortium (M3) gave significantly higher total microbial population and dehydrogenase activity than other tillage practices.
- Intervention effect Residue incorporation (M3) gave significantly higher post-harvest soil available NPK in maize.
- Intervention effect Residue incorporation (M3) gave the lowest weed density and weed dry matter among tillage practices.
- Intervention effect Zero-tillage (M4) was on par with residue incorporation (M3) for these parameters.
- Intervention effect All the parameters were significantly lower under conventional tillage (M1).
- Intervention effect Energy use efficiency, specific energy and net energy were best under conventional tillage (M1).
- Intervention effect Energy productivity and energy intensiveness were best under conventional tillage (M1).
- Intervention effect N1 (100% RDF) gave significantly higher total microbial population and dehydrogenase activity.
- Intervention effect N1 (100% RDF) gave significantly higher post-harvest soil available NPK of maize.
- Intervention effect Energy use efficiency, specific energy and net energy were best under N1 (100% RDF).
- Intervention effect Energy productivity was best under N1 (100% RDF).
- Intervention effect Energy intensiveness was best with N3 (87.5% of RDN, 75% RDP and 75% RDK).
- Intervention effect Nutrient levels had a non-significant effect on energy use efficiency, energy productivity and energy intensiveness.
- Intervention effect Tillage had no significant effect on moisture content and bulk density at sowing, tasselling and silking, and harvest stages.
- Intervention effect Nutrient levels had no significant effect on moisture content and bulk density at sowing, tasselling and silking, and harvest stages.
- Intervention effect Quality parameters showed similar results, with no significant effect of tillage or nutrient levels.
- Intervention effect The tillage by nutrient level interaction was non-significant for quality parameters, soil physico-chemical parameters and energy indices.