Claim · model-written summary
Residue incorporation (M3) gave significantly higher post-harvest soil available NPK in maize.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“residue incorporation (M3) had recorded significantly higher total microbial population, dehydrogenase activity and post-harvest soil available NPK of maize”
Title
Parangi Naveen; K. Akhil; Y. Siva Lakshmi; et al. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change 2023. doi:10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i123666
Other claims from this paper (17)
- Intervention effect Residue incorporation with microbial consortium (M3) gave significantly higher total microbial population and dehydrogenase activity than other tillage practices.
- Intervention effect Residue incorporation (M3) gave the lowest weed density and weed dry matter among tillage practices.
- Intervention effect Zero-tillage (M4) was on par with residue incorporation (M3) for these parameters.
- Intervention effect All the parameters were significantly lower under conventional tillage (M1).
- Intervention effect Energy use efficiency, specific energy and net energy were best under conventional tillage (M1).
- Intervention effect Energy productivity and energy intensiveness were best under conventional tillage (M1).
- Intervention effect N1 (100% RDF) gave significantly higher total microbial population and dehydrogenase activity.
- Intervention effect N1 (100% RDF) gave significantly higher post-harvest soil available NPK of maize.
- Intervention effect Energy use efficiency, specific energy and net energy were best under N1 (100% RDF).
- Intervention effect Energy productivity was best under N1 (100% RDF).
- Intervention effect Energy intensiveness was best with N3 (87.5% of RDN, 75% RDP and 75% RDK).
- Intervention effect Nutrient levels had a non-significant effect on energy use efficiency, energy productivity and energy intensiveness.
- Intervention effect Tillage had no significant effect on moisture content and bulk density at sowing, tasselling and silking, and harvest stages.
- Intervention effect Nutrient levels had no significant effect on moisture content and bulk density at sowing, tasselling and silking, and harvest stages.
- Intervention effect Quality parameters showed similar results, with no significant effect of tillage or nutrient levels.
- Intervention effect The tillage by nutrient level interaction was non-significant for soil microbial studies, enzymatic activity and weed parameters.
- Intervention effect The tillage by nutrient level interaction was non-significant for quality parameters, soil physico-chemical parameters and energy indices.