Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Soil fumigation gave marketable pepper yields equal to or above the statewide conventional average at the conventional site in 1999.

A claim from Yield potential and soil quality under alternative crop production practices for fresh market pepper · 2004

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil fumigation gave marketable pepper yields equal to or above the statewide conventional average at the conventional site in 1999.

Taxon
Capsicum annuumCapsicum annuume0
Treatment
soil fumigatione1
Outcome
Marketable yieldse1
Direction
equal to, or abovee1
Comparator
statewide average for conventional production systemse1
Setting
conventional sitee1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fresh market pepper (Capsicum annuum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–183
e1

“Marketable yields equal to, or above, the 1999/2000 statewide average for conventional production systems were obtained with soil fumigation and soil solarization at the conventional site in 1999”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1649–1844

Title

Yield potential and soil quality under alternative crop production practices for fresh market pepper

Dan O. Chellemi; Erin N. Rosskopf Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 2004. doi:10.1079/raf200479

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-aedcfe9be9bbb5061ed5b8792df04d6f44c860b3bbb397f0f69628635ceb7100 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

solarization · quality: postharvest · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.