Claim · model-written summary
Compared with NL, NM enhanced tomato WUEy by 22.6%.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- NMe0
- Outcome
- WUEye0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Value
- 22.6%e0
- Comparator
- NLe0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compared to NL, NM enhanced tomato yield, TNU, WUEy and WUEd by 28.5%, 35.3%, 22.6% and 16.3%”
t0“tomato”
Title
Liu Xiaogang; Li Fusheng; Zhang Fucang; et al. International journal of agricultural and biological engineering 2017. doi:10.25165/j.ijabe.20171006.2541
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Intervention effect Compared with conventional irrigation, alternate partial root-zone irrigation decreased water consumption of tomato by 16.0%-33.1%.
- Intervention effect Compared with conventional irrigation, alternate partial root-zone irrigation increased water use efficiency of yield (WUEy) of tomato by 6.7%-11.9%.
- Intervention effect Compared with conventional irrigation, alternate partial root-zone irrigation increased water use efficiency of dry mass (WUEd) of tomato by 10.2%-15.9%.
- Intervention effect The AI1 alternate irrigation treatment did not significantly decline tomato yield, total N uptake (TNU) or N use efficiency (NUE).
- Intervention effect Compared with the low urea rate (NL), the middle urea rate (NM) enhanced tomato yield by 28.5%.
- Intervention effect Compared with NL, NM enhanced tomato total N uptake (TNU) by 35.3%.
- Intervention effect Compared with NL, NM enhanced tomato WUEd by 16.3%.
- Intervention effect Compared with CINL, AI1NM reduced tomato water consumption by 12.5%.
- Intervention effect Compared with CINL, AI1NM increased tomato yield by 35.5%.
- Intervention effect Compared with CINL, AI1NM increased tomato total N uptake (TNU) by 58.4%.
- Intervention effect Compared with CINL, AI1NM increased tomato WUEy by 54.4%.
- Intervention effect Compared with CINL, AI1NM increased tomato WUEd by 53.7%.
- Recommendation The authors conclude that AI1 can improve water use efficiency and total N uptake of tomato simultaneously at a medium urea rate.