Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar fungicide treatments improved wheat baking quality through gluten content.

A claim from The effect of foliar fungicide treatments on the wheat yield and quality. · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar fungicide treatments improved wheat baking quality through gluten content.

Treatment
Foliar fungicide treatmentse1
Outcome
quality in term bakinge0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
due to gluten contente0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were really improved the quality in term baking due to gluten content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–518
e1

“Foliar fungicide treatments assured substantially significant yield gains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–448
t0

“wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–60

Title

The effect of foliar fungicide treatments on the wheat yield and quality.

E Nagy; I. Haş; Dominik Nagy DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 2009. doi:10.15835/arspa.v69i1-2.3504

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-afa5e8ca3ff0e582b48df24ac1d95da752dafe64944b9163f3dc8591ef0de302 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

fungicide · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 7 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    None of the fungicides caused significant changes in mono- and oligosaccharide content or breadmaking quality.

    Effect of Fungicide Treatment on the Quality of Wheat Flour and Breadmaking · 2004

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Fungicide treatments left the quality of dough and flour unaffected.

    Yield losses in wheat caused by stripe rust ( Puccinia striiformis West.) in northern New South Wales · 1990

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Single fungicide Alert 375 SC application did not produce the beneficial grain yield and quality effect.

    EFFECT OF FERTILISATION DOSE, PLANT PROTECTION INPUT, AND SEEDING DENSITY ON THE YIELD AND GRAIN TECHNOLOGICAL QUALITY OF WINTER WHEAT GROWN IN SHORT-TIME MONOCULTURE ON LIGHT SOIL · 2010

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Early fungicide applications produced lower wheat quality than later applications.

    The Value of Early Fungicide Applications in Wheat · 2020 · compared with later fungicide applications (BBCH 39-45 and BBCH 6163)

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    The fungicide did not affect grain quality.

    A Novel Fungicide Consortium: Is It Better for Wheat Production and How Does It Affect the Rhizosphere Microbiome? · 2025

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Studied fungicides did not influence wheat seed physiological quality.

    Physiological quality and aflatoxin presence in wheat seeds treated with fungicides and adjuvants during crop development · 2019

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Fungicide application did not influence wheat seed physiological quality.

    Physiological quality and aflatoxin presence in wheat seeds treated with fungicides and adjuvants during crop development · 2019

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Fungicide treatment improved malt quality.

    Establishing the impact of Fusarium culmorum infection and fungicide treatment on wheat malt quality · 2018

    Same direction

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

application · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 27 positive, 4 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Foliar silicon did not affect wheat seed physiological quality.

    Foliar application of silicon and the effect on wheat seed yield and quality · 2013

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Foliar P had marginal effect on grain yield, P uptake, and seed nutritional value.

    Response of canola, wheat, and pea to foliar phosphorus fertilization at a phosphorus-deficient site in eastern Saskatchewan · 2020

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Late foliar sprays did not increase wheat grain quality.

    Application of nitrogen fertilizers to spring wheat on meadowchernozem soil in the Omsk Irtysh region · 2024

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    One bactericide spray at flowering did not change grain quality.

    Influence on Yield and Quality of Hard Wheat with Nitrogen,Phosphor,Kalium,lrrigation and Germicide · 2006

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Among the Zn and Fe concentrations and the soil or foliar methods, combined foliar spray of 0.5% ZnSO4 and 1% FeSO4 significantly improved the maximum growth or quality attributes of wheat.

    Biofortification with Zinc and Iron Improves the Grain Quality and Yield of Wheat Crop · 2020 · compared with different Zn and Fe concentrations applied either soil supplement or foliar spray

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Foliar iron and zinc increased wheat grain quality.

    Effect of foliar application of iron and zinc on nutrient uptake and grain yield of wheat under different irrigation regimes · 2018

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Directing the fine spray and air stream 30 forward increased deposits on wheat heads.

    Field Evaluations of Application Techniques for Fungicide Spray Deposition on Wheat and Artificial Targets · 2012

    Same direction

  8. positive
    S3 spraying produced the highest quality traits.

    EFFECT OF FOLIAR APPLICATION OF MORINGA LEAVES EXTRACT ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF BREAD WHEAT · 2022

    Same direction

22 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.