Claim · model-written summary
Recovery of ADL in iNDF was 0.562 for grass silages.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier
Verbatim
e6“Recovery of ADL in i NDF was 0·562 and 0·801 for grass and red clover silages”
Title
Indigestible neutral detergent fibre in predictions of grass and red clover silage digestibility
S. J. Krizsan; H. Mirzaei Alamouti; M. Rinne; et al. Grass and Forage Science 2013. doi:10.1111/gfs.12029
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Method / resource Silage concentration of iNDF predicted organic matter digestibility better than the different lignin fractions.
- Intervention effect Correcting individual silage samples for loss of ADL lowered the prediction error of OMD.
- Intervention effect A general correction based on the Lucas fits of ADL in iNDF lowered the prediction error of OMD.
- Observation Slopes of Lucas fits did not differ between primary and regrowth grass and red clover silages.
- Observation Faecal recovery of ADL was not different from unity.
- Observation Recovery of ADL in iNDF was 0.801 for red clover silages.