Claim · model-written summary
Correcting individual silage samples for loss of ADL lowered the prediction error of OMD.
- Taxon
- grass and red clovere0
- Treatment
- Correcting individual samples for loss of ADLe2
- Outcome
- prediction error of OMDe2
- Direction
- lowerede2
- Qualifier
- the improvements in predictions of OMD were marginale3
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue
Verbatim
e0“primary and regrowth grass and red clover silages with known in vivo OMD in sheep were used”
e2“Correcting individual samples for loss of ADL as well as using a general correction based on the Lucas fits of ADL in i NDF of grass and red clover silages lowered the prediction error of OMD”
e3“despite losses of ADL in i NDF, the improvements in predictions of OMD were marginal”
Title
Indigestible neutral detergent fibre in predictions of grass and red clover silage digestibility
S. J. Krizsan; H. Mirzaei Alamouti; M. Rinne; et al. Grass and Forage Science 2013. doi:10.1111/gfs.12029
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Method / resource Silage concentration of iNDF predicted organic matter digestibility better than the different lignin fractions.
- Intervention effect A general correction based on the Lucas fits of ADL in iNDF lowered the prediction error of OMD.
- Observation Slopes of Lucas fits did not differ between primary and regrowth grass and red clover silages.
- Observation Faecal recovery of ADL was not different from unity.
- Observation Recovery of ADL in iNDF was 0.562 for grass silages.
- Observation Recovery of ADL in iNDF was 0.801 for red clover silages.