Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The ORAC value of 50% acetone extracts of wheat was 3-20-fold greater than that of ethanol extracts.

A claim from Comparison of Swiss Red Wheat Grain and Fractions for Their Antioxidant Properties · 2004

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The ORAC value of 50% acetone extracts of wheat was 3-20-fold greater than that of ethanol extracts.

Treatment
50% acetone extractse1
Outcome
ORAC valuee1
Direction
greatere1
Value
3-20-folde1
Comparator
ethanol extractse1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In addition, 50% acetone and ethanol were compared for their effects on wheat ORAC values. The ORAC value of 50% acetone extracts was 3-20-fold greater than that of the ethanol extracts, indicating that 50% acetone may be a better solvent system for monitoring antioxidant properties of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1462

Title

Comparison of Swiss Red Wheat Grain and Fractions for Their Antioxidant Properties

Kequan Zhou; Joseph J. Laux; Liangli (Lucy) Yu Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2004. doi:10.1021/jf030640w

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-afc657e8fdff311ee3912256b295041e664ce60ab7aec0696994857cbfd1caba · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

botanical · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 28 positive, 12 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

31 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.