Method / resourcemodel-written summary

Rooting capacity was best modeled by linear combinations of five stem anatomy measures.

A claim from STOCKPLANT ETIOLATION AND SHOOT AGE EFFECTS ON ANATOMY AND ADVENTITIOUS ROOT FORMATION IN STEM CUTTINGS OF CARPINUS BETULUS `FASTIGIATA · 1990

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rooting capacity was best modeled by linear combinations of five stem anatomy measures.

Taxon
Carpinus betulusCarpinus betulust0
Outcome
rooting capacitye0
Comparator
beste0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carpinus betulus
Carpinus betulus · TaxonBotaurus · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rooting capacity was modelled best by linear combinations of the widths of the pith, non-lignified secondary xylem, cortical parenchyma and periderm, as well as the percentage of gaps in the sclerenchymatic sheath remaining non-sclerified.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–1036
t0

“STOCKPLANT ETIOLATION AND SHOOT AGE EFFECTS ON ANATOMY AND ADVENTITIOUS ROOT FORMATION IN STEM CUTTINGS OF CARPINUS BETULUS `FASTIGIATA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–135

Title

STOCKPLANT ETIOLATION AND SHOOT AGE EFFECTS ON ANATOMY AND ADVENTITIOUS ROOT FORMATION IN STEM CUTTINGS OF CARPINUS BETULUS `FASTIGIATA

Brian K Maynard; Nina L. Bassuk HortScience 1990. doi:10.21273/hortsci.25.9.1095d

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-afdbabbe1798e18504080a9f7ddb2a7011cddd2fda702e69f726a368d0442ffa · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer