Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Mulching gave the highest net return.

A claim from RESPONSE OF PEARLMILLET CULTIVARS TO DIFFERENT MOISTURE CONSERVATION PRACTICES UNDER RAINFED CONDITION ON LIGHT TEXTURED SOIL OF CENTRAL UTTAR PRADESH, INDIA · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching gave the highest net return.

Taxon
PEARLMILLETCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
mulching practicee0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The roots plant-1 , dry weight of roots plant-1, soil moisture status, WUE and net return were also the highest, where mulching practice was taken as moisture conservation practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–933
t0

“PEARLMILLET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–23

Title

RESPONSE OF PEARLMILLET CULTIVARS TO DIFFERENT MOISTURE CONSERVATION PRACTICES UNDER RAINFED CONDITION ON LIGHT TEXTURED SOIL OF CENTRAL UTTAR PRADESH, INDIA

P.K. Rajput; Yogesh Kumar; A.K. Katiyar; et al. PLANT ARCHIVES 2022. doi:10.51470/plantarchives.2022.v22.no1.016

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-b03036c2c3382ec6e8f48f26a903705624e276eb5822745ff67696569ce7dc7c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

mulching · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results differ

19 papers: 17 positive, 2 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.