Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Residue tillage increased cowpea grain yield by 49% in both seasons and 18% in rabi alone.

A claim from Conservation tillage and weed management practices effect on weeds, yield and profitability of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue tillage increased cowpea grain yield by 49% in both seasons and 18% in rabi alone.

Treatment
zero tillage with residue applicatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“zero tillage with residue application during both kharif and rabi season and only during rabi for four years significantly increased the the grain yield by 49 and 18%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–470
e1

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–121

Title

Conservation tillage and weed management practices effect on weeds, yield and profitability of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)

D S SASODE; EKTA JOSHI; DINESH JINGER; et al. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2020. doi:10.56093/ijas.v90i1.98548

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-b0d4b7c7fee67ff908e226e2e8b5d4b49912a8b8ac785a44ee3d4dc3d09d88ba · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

35 papers: 27 positive, 8 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.