Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Increasing plant density increased forage yield per unit area.

A claim from The Effect of Sowing Date and Plant Density on Morphology, Phenology and Yield Variables of Maize Hybrids in Bonab Region · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing plant density increased forage yield per unit area.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
increasing of plant densitye7
Outcome
forage yield per unit areae7
Direction
increasede7

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize Hybrids in Bonab Region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–121
e7

“With increasing of plant density, forage yield per plant was decreased significantly and forage yield per unit area was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1217

Title

The Effect of Sowing Date and Plant Density on Morphology, Phenology and Yield Variables of Maize Hybrids in Bonab Region

Ali Asghar Aliloo; Hasan Ali Fathi Goshgye; Esmaeil Mohammadi DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 2012

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-b0d76f86df85d0a2d244b26b5cf06c60ebed242f2731835c0fdf47ae8b6c76a1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

density · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

658 papers: 519 positive, 139 negative or no effect

518 papers in the same direction as this claim · 132 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Shade reduced yield 66% at high density.

    Intensifying Plant Density Response of Corn with Artificial Shade · 1992 · compared with ambient light

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

649 papers more in this group

See all 658 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.