Claim · model-written summary
SOC stock at 15–30 cm did not differ significantly.
Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingOutcomeDirectionValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“remained non‐significant at 15–30 cm depth.”
Title
Jayanta Layek; Anup Das; Gandhiji Idapuganti Ramkrushna; et al. Land Degradation and Development 2021. doi:10.1002/ldr.4067
Other claims from this paper (14)
- Intervention effect Residue retention lowered soil bulk density relative to removal.
- Intervention effect Residue retention increased water holding capacity.
- Intervention effect Residue retention improved infiltration rate.
- Intervention effect Standing stubble or mulch increased soil organic carbon.
- Intervention effect Standing stubble or mulch increased soil microbial biomass carbon.
- Intervention effect Standing stubble or mulch increased dehydrogenase activity.
- Intervention effect Standing stubble or mulch increased available nitrogen.
- Intervention effect Standing stubble or mulch increased phosphorus content.
- Intervention effect Mulching increased SOC stock at 0–15 cm.
- Intervention effect Mulching increased lentil seed yield over residue removal.
- Intervention effect Standing stubble increased lentil seed yield over removal.
- Intervention effect Lentil after Shahsarang-1 yielded more than after Mendri.
- Intervention effect DPL-81 yielded more than IPL-406 after medium-duration rice.
- Recommendation The authors recommend Shahsarang-1 followed by DPL-81 with residue retention.