Paper · 2021 · Land Degradation and Development

Managing rice fallow lands of the Eastern Indian Himalayas: Impacts of residue management and varietal interventions on soil properties, carbon stocks, and productivity

Jayanta Layek; Anup Das; Gandhiji Idapuganti Ramkrushna; et al.

15
claims
15
verbatim quotes
17
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Degenerating soil properties, low diversification, and productivity are the major issues for keeping large areas as fallow after rainy season rice ( Oryza sativa L.) in Southeast Asia. Long‐duration rice cultivars along with conventional till farming and lack of irrigation facilities limit the chances of growing succeeding crops like pulses in rice fallow areas. Therefore, a field study was conducted to test the hypothesis that cultivating short‐duration rice and lentil ( Lens culinaris Medic.) cultivars along with residue retention through mulching or standing rice stubble under no‐till (NT) farming for lentil can enhance the productivity in rice fallow areas and improve economic returns from the cropping system by conserving soil moisture and improving soil properties and carbon stocks. Two rice cultivars (namely, Shahsarang‐1: high yielding and medium duration; and Mendri: local, low yielding, and long‐duration variety), two high biomass lentil varieties (DPL‐81: early duration and IPL‐406: medium duration), and three rice residue management practices (namely, residue removal, 20 cm standing stubble, and mulching at 5 Mg ha −1 in lentil) were tested in the rice–lentil system. After harvest of rainy season rice, lentil was sown under NT using a manually operated furrow opener. Results of a 3‐year study revealed that rice residue retention as mulch at 5 Mg ha −1 and 20 cm standing stubbles (~2 Mg ha −1 ) conserved residual soil moisture and recorded significantly lower bulk density (1.10 and 1.09 Mg m −3 ), increased water‐holding capacity (57.05% and 55.14%), and improved water infiltration rate (3.47 and 3.30 cm hr −1 ) compared to residue removal. Soil organic carbon (SOC), soil microbial biomass carbon, dehydrogenase enzyme activity, available nitrogen, and phosphorus contents at 0–15 cm soil depth were significantly higher by 7.2%–11.1%, 3.9%–6.8%, 4.1%–6.7%, 2.7%–6.4%, and 2.7%–8.0%, respectively, under standing rice stubbles/mulching than residue removal. The SOC stock (25.3 Mg ha ‐1 ) under mulching was significantly higher than that recorded under residue removal at 0–15 cm (23.4 Mg ha −1 ) and remained non‐significant at 15–30 cm depth. A significantly higher mean seed yield of lentil was obtained under mulching (1.68 Mg ha −1 ) and standing stubbles (1.49 Mg ha −1 ) than that under removal (1.27 Mg ha −1 ). Average productivity of lentil (1.53 Mg ha −1 ) after medium‐duration rice variety Shahsarang‐1 was greater than that grown after local long‐duration rice variety Mendri (1.43 Mg ha −1 ). The mean seed yield of early lentil variety DPL‐81 grown after medium‐duration rice was significantly higher (1.60 Mg ha −1 ) than medium‐duration lentil variety IPL‐406 (1.36 Mg ha −1 ). Thus, cultivating medium‐duration rice (Shahsarang‐1) followed by early‐duration lentil variety (DPL‐81) and rice residue retention either through mulching or standing rice stubble is recommended for improving soil properties, carbon stock, and productivity of lentil in rice fallow areas of the Eastern Himalayan region of India and other similar agro‐ecosystems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue retention lowered soil bulk density relative to removal.

Outcome
bulk densitye0
Direction
lowere0
Value
1.10 and 1.09 Mg m −3e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“recorded significantly lower bulk density (1.10 and 1.09 Mg m −3 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1475–1541 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue retention increased water holding capacity.

Outcome
water‐holding capacitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
57.05% and 55.14%e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increased water‐holding capacity (57.05% and 55.14%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1543–1595 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue retention improved infiltration rate.

Outcome
water infiltration ratee0
Direction
improvede0
Value
3.47 and 3.30 cm hr −1e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“improved water infiltration rate (3.47 and 3.30 cm hr −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1601–1659 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Standing stubble or mulch increased soil organic carbon.

Treatment
standing rice stubbles/mulchinge0
Outcome
Soil organic carbon (SOC)e0
Direction
highere0
Value
7.2%–11.1%e0
Comparator
residue removale0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Soil organic carbon (SOC), soil microbial biomass carbon, dehydrogenase enzyme activity, available nitrogen, and phosphorus contents at 0–15 cm soil depth were significantly higher by 7.2%–11.1%, 3.9%–6.8%, 4.1%–6.7%, 2.7%–6.4%, and 2.7%–8.0%, respectively, under standing rice stubbles/mulching than residue removal.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1689–2006 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Standing stubble or mulch increased soil microbial biomass carbon.

Outcome
soil microbial biomass carbone0
Direction
highere0
Value
3.9%–6.8%e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“soil microbial biomass carbon, dehydrogenase enzyme activity, available nitrogen, and phosphorus contents at 0–15 cm soil depth were significantly higher by 7.2%–11.1%, 3.9%–6.8%, 4.1%–6.7%, 2.7%–6.4%, and 2.7%–8.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1716–1931 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Standing stubble or mulch increased dehydrogenase activity.

Outcome
dehydrogenase enzyme activitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.1%–6.7%e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“dehydrogenase enzyme activity, available nitrogen, and phosphorus contents at 0–15 cm soil depth were significantly higher by 7.2%–11.1%, 3.9%–6.8%, 4.1%–6.7%, 2.7%–6.4%, and 2.7%–8.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1747–1931 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Standing stubble or mulch increased available nitrogen.

Outcome
available nitrogene0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.7%–6.4%e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“available nitrogen, and phosphorus contents at 0–15 cm soil depth were significantly higher by 7.2%–11.1%, 3.9%–6.8%, 4.1%–6.7%, 2.7%–6.4%, and 2.7%–8.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1778–1931 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Standing stubble or mulch increased phosphorus content.

Outcome
phosphorus contentse0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.7%–8.0%e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“phosphorus contents at 0–15 cm soil depth were significantly higher by 7.2%–11.1%, 3.9%–6.8%, 4.1%–6.7%, 2.7%–6.4%, and 2.7%–8.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1802–1931 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching increased SOC stock at 0–15 cm.

Treatment
mulchinge0
Outcome
SOC stocke0
Direction
highere0
Value
25.3 Mg ha ‐1e0
Qualifier
23.4 Mg ha −1e0
Comparator
residue removale0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The SOC stock (25.3 Mg ha ‐1 ) under mulching was significantly higher than that recorded under residue removal at 0–15 cm (23.4 Mg ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2007–2146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SOC stock at 15–30 cm did not differ significantly.

Not reportedTaxonOrgan / stageTreatmentComparatorOutcomeDirection

Verbatim

e0

“remained non‐significant at 15–30 cm depth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2151–2194 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching increased lentil seed yield over residue removal.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
mulchinge0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.68 Mg ha −1e0
Comparator
removale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significantly higher mean seed yield of lentil was obtained under mulching (1.68 Mg ha −1 ) and standing stubbles (1.49 Mg ha −1 ) than that under removal (1.27 Mg ha −1 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2195–2369 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Standing stubble increased lentil seed yield over removal.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
standing stubblese0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.49 Mg ha −1e0
Comparator
removale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significantly higher mean seed yield of lentil was obtained under mulching (1.68 Mg ha −1 ) and standing stubbles (1.49 Mg ha −1 ) than that under removal (1.27 Mg ha −1 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2195–2369 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lentil after Shahsarang-1 yielded more than after Mendri.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
Shahsarang‐1e0
Outcome
productivity of lentile0
Direction
greatere0
Value
1.53 Mg ha −1e0
Comparator
Mendrie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Average productivity of lentil (1.53 Mg ha −1 ) after medium‐duration rice variety Shahsarang‐1 was greater than that grown after local long‐duration rice variety Mendri (1.43 Mg ha −1 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2370–2557 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

DPL-81 yielded more than IPL-406 after medium-duration rice.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Material
DPL‐81e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.60 Mg ha −1e0
Comparator
IPL‐406e0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean seed yield of early lentil variety DPL‐81 grown after medium‐duration rice was significantly higher (1.60 Mg ha −1 ) than medium‐duration lentil variety IPL‐406 (1.36 Mg ha −1 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2558–2745 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend Shahsarang-1 followed by DPL-81 with residue retention.

Outcome
cultivating medium‐duration rice (Shahsarang‐1) followed by early‐duration lentil variety (DPL‐81) and rice residue retention either through mulching or standing rice stubblee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cultivating medium‐duration rice (Shahsarang‐1) followed by early‐duration lentil variety (DPL‐81) and rice residue retention either through mulching or standing rice stubble is recommended”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2752–2941 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.