Intervention effectmodel-written summary

45 cm stem cuttings gave higher yield attributes than shorter cuttings at both locations in both years.

A claim from PERFORMANCE OF SWEET POTATO (IPOMOEA BATATAS [L.] LAM) VARIETIES AS INFLUENCED BY ORGANIC-MINERAL FERTILIZER RATE AND STEM CUTTING LENGTH IN THE NIGERIAN AGRO-ECOLOGICAL ZONES · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

45 cm stem cuttings gave higher yield attributes than shorter cuttings at both locations in both years.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
stem cutting length of 45cme0
Outcome
yield attributese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
two other cutting lengthse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stem cutting length of 45cm gave higher measured growth and yield attributes, compared to the two other cutting lengths at both locations in both years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1557–1709
t0

“sweet potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 15–27

Title

PERFORMANCE OF SWEET POTATO (IPOMOEA BATATAS [L.] LAM) VARIETIES AS INFLUENCED BY ORGANIC-MINERAL FERTILIZER RATE AND STEM CUTTING LENGTH IN THE NIGERIAN AGRO-ECOLOGICAL ZONES

Muazu, Abdu; James, Ishaku Dantata Journal of Agripreneurship and Sustainable Development 2021. doi:10.59331/jasd.v4i3.244

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-b1fa77cbbbcca57dab45948127334fa167549468e513b480f1af094b90cf4fef · schema claims-v0.9 · position 12 in the model’s answer

pruning · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results differ

16 papers: 6 positive, 10 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.