Claim · model-written summary
Using light attenuation alone to estimate source reduction may bias estimates.
- Taxon
- bread wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Outcome
- estimations of source reduction on the basis of light attenuatione0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“bread wheat”
e0“estimations of source reduction on the basis of light attenuation could be biased, because the photosynthesis decrease is less than proportional”
Title
Maria L. Maydup; Mariana Antonietta; Nicolás Rouillet; et al. Crop and Pasture Science 2020. doi:10.1071/cp18565
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect Midday ETR and carbon assimilation fell under shade, but less than proportionally to mesh light transmittance.
- Observation Mesh-induced reductions in transmittance and photosynthesis were greater in morning and afternoon than at midday.
- Association Control wheat midday ETR declined progressively with grain-filling age relative to shade treatments.
- Observation Initial photosynthesis differences between shade treatments diminished during grain filling.
- Intervention effect Shade lowered air temperature, especially at midday.
- Intervention effect Severe shade produced the lowest measured canopy temperature.
- Intervention effect Shade delayed senescence at 19 days after anthesis.
- Intervention effect Shade reduced grain weight per ear, mainly at 50% and 10% transmittance.
- Association The decrease in grain weight per ear was not proportional to the decrease in photosynthesis.
- Observation Stem dry matter retranslocation increased under shade.