Claim · model-written summary
Canola and lupin crop biomass was lower than wheat and barley biomass.
- Taxon
- Canola
.jpg?width=60)
Brassica napus var. napuse3 - Outcome
- crop biomasse3
- Direction
- lowere3
- Comparator
- wheat and barleye3
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e3“Canola and lupin crop biomass were lower, compared with wheat and barley”
Title
Richard C. Hayes; Matthew T. Newell; Anthony D. Swan; et al. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 2022. doi:10.1111/jac.12588
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Intervention effect Grain yields of cover crops in mixed drill rows were similar to crops grown without pasture species.
- Intervention effect Alternate drill rows reduced cover-crop grain yields by an average of 24% relative to mixed drill rows.
- Observation Canola and lupin as cover crops led to increased pasture yields in year 1.
- Recommendation Canola and lupin should be used more as cover or companion crops in semi-arid environments.
- Intervention effect Pasture yields beyond year 1 were reduced by about 20% in alternate drill row treatments compared with mixed drill rows, with greater differences in more favourable conditions.
- Observation Yield reductions in lucerne were concentrated in the fewer drill rows of the alternate configuration.
- Intervention effect The alternate drill row configuration increased subterranean clover abundance in year 1.
- Observation Subterranean clover remained a minor component of all swards beyond the establishment year.
- Observation Grain size was smallest where previous pastures contained lucerne and subterranean clover without phalaris.
- Observation Protein concentration in grain was highest where previous pastures contained lucerne and subterranean clover without phalaris.
- Observation Spatially separating species in drill rows at sowing gave little advantage in total productivity.