Claim · model-written summary
Three hormone-free subcultures did not remove the unusual shoot morphology of micropropagated ginger.
- Treatment
- 3 cycles on a hormone-free mediume0
- Outcome
- shoot morphologye0
- Direction
- similar characteristicse0
- Qualifier
- did not appear to be relatede0
Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue
Verbatim
e0“The unusual shoot morphology of the micropropagated plants did not appear to be related to the presence of benzylaminopurine, a plant growth hormone added to the multiplication medium, as plants subcultured for 3 cycles on a hormone-free medium also exhibited similar characteristics.”
Title
Field evaluation of micropropagated and conventionally propagated ginger in subtropical Queensland
MK Smith; SD Hamill Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 1996. doi:10.1071/ea9960347
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Observation First-generation micropropagated ginger had lower rhizome yield than seed-derived plants.
- Observation First-generation micropropagated ginger had smaller rhizome knobs.
- Observation First-generation micropropagated ginger had more roots.
- Observation Micropropagated ginger had a greater shoot to rhizome ratio than seed-derived plants.
- Observation Micropropagated ginger had smaller shoots than seed-derived plants.
- Observation Micropropagated ginger had more shoots per plant than seed-derived plants.
- Observation Seed collected from micropropagated ginger was smaller than seed from seed-derived plants.
- Observation By the second generation ex vitro, the treatments showed no significant differences.
- Recommendation Routine industry use of micropropagated ginger requires improvements in rhizome size and production cost.