Claim · model-written summary
By the second generation ex vitro, the treatments showed no significant differences.
- Organ / stage
- second generation ex vitroe0
- Outcome
- differences between the treatmentse0
- Direction
- no significant differencese0
Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“by the second generation ex vitro there were no significant differences between the treatments.”
Title
Field evaluation of micropropagated and conventionally propagated ginger in subtropical Queensland
MK Smith; SD Hamill Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 1996. doi:10.1071/ea9960347
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Observation First-generation micropropagated ginger had lower rhizome yield than seed-derived plants.
- Observation First-generation micropropagated ginger had smaller rhizome knobs.
- Observation First-generation micropropagated ginger had more roots.
- Observation Micropropagated ginger had a greater shoot to rhizome ratio than seed-derived plants.
- Observation Micropropagated ginger had smaller shoots than seed-derived plants.
- Observation Micropropagated ginger had more shoots per plant than seed-derived plants.
- Observation Three hormone-free subcultures did not remove the unusual shoot morphology of micropropagated ginger.
- Observation Seed collected from micropropagated ginger was smaller than seed from seed-derived plants.
- Recommendation Routine industry use of micropropagated ginger requires improvements in rhizome size and production cost.