Intervention effectmodel-written summary

I2 irrigation reduced applied water by 8.2% relative to I3.

A claim from Faba Bean Yield and Water Productivity as Affected by Irrigation and Intercropping Systems · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I2 irrigation reduced applied water by 8.2% relative to I3.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
I2e0
Outcome
Applied watere0
Direction
reducede0
Value
8.2%e0
Comparator
I3e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applied water were reduced by 21.6% and 8.2% for I1 and I2 compared to I3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–964
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 0–9

Title

Faba Bean Yield and Water Productivity as Affected by Irrigation and Intercropping Systems

Moshira A. El-Shamy; Amira A. Kasem; M. A. Mahmoud; et al. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 2021. doi:10.9734/ijpss/2021/v33i2430803

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-b4e744b7e2b65b996be1bb2d571f33104c4355915133bd74f85b3ed4c95fea36 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer