Paper · 2021 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Faba Bean Yield and Water Productivity as Affected by Irrigation and Intercropping Systems

Moshira A. El-Shamy; Amira A. Kasem; M. A. Mahmoud; et al.

9
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Irrigation with intensive intercropping, in water scarce region is evaluated and optimized. Water productivity (WP) is taken as an indicator and quantified. A field experiment was carried out in Sakha Agricultural Research Station in Egypt during 2019/2020 and 2020/2021 seasons. A split plot design was applied, main plots were devoted for irrigation treatments of two (I1), three (I2) and four (I3) irrigations. Whereas fennouil, red radish and brassica crops were intercropped with faba bean in the sub-plots. Results showed that the highest yield and yield attributes of faba bean were obtained from irrigation treatment of I3, faba bean with fennouil intercropping and the interaction between faba bean intercropping with fennouil and irrigation treatment of I3 in both seasons. Water consumptive use was increased by 17% and 24% after irrigation treatment of I2 and I3 compared to I1. Applied water were reduced by 21.6% and 8.2% for I1 and I2 compared to I3. The highest value of WP was obtained from the interaction between irrigation treatment I3 and faba bean with fennouil intercropping. It could be concluded that applying the interaction of I1 and faba bean with fennouil intercropping, because it saved significant amount of irrigation water and enhanced water productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four irrigations gave the highest faba bean yield and yield attributes.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
irrigation treatment of I3e0
Outcome
yield and yield attributese0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest yield and yield attributes of faba bean were obtained from irrigation treatment of I3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–630 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Faba bean with fennouil intercropping gave the highest yield and yield attributes.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
faba bean with fennouil intercroppinge0
Outcome
yield and yield attributese0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest yield and yield attributes of faba bean were obtained from irrigation treatment of I3, faba bean with fennouil intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–669 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Faba bean with fennouil under I3 irrigation gave the highest yield and yield attributes in both seasons.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae1
Treatment
faba bean intercropping with fennouil and irrigation treatment of I3e0
Outcome
yield and yield attributese1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the interaction between faba bean intercropping with fennouil and irrigation treatment of I3 in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–782 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest yield and yield attributes of faba bean were obtained from irrigation treatment of I3, faba bean with fennouil intercropping and the interaction between faba bean intercropping with fennouil and irrigation treatment of I3 in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–782 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I2 irrigation increased water consumptive use by 17% relative to I1.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
I2e0
Outcome
Water consumptive usee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
17%e0
Comparator
I1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water consumptive use was increased by 17% and 24% after irrigation treatment of I2 and I3 compared to I1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–889 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I3 irrigation increased water consumptive use by 24% relative to I1.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
I3e0
Outcome
Water consumptive usee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
24%e0
Comparator
I1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water consumptive use was increased by 17% and 24% after irrigation treatment of I2 and I3 compared to I1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–889 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I1 irrigation reduced applied water by 21.6% relative to I3.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
I1e0
Outcome
Applied watere0
Direction
reducede0
Value
21.6%e0
Comparator
I3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applied water were reduced by 21.6% and 8.2% for I1 and I2 compared to I3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–964 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I2 irrigation reduced applied water by 8.2% relative to I3.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
I2e0
Outcome
Applied watere0
Direction
reducede0
Value
8.2%e0
Comparator
I3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applied water were reduced by 21.6% and 8.2% for I1 and I2 compared to I3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–964 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I3 irrigation with fennouil intercropping gave the highest water productivity.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
irrigation treatment I3 and faba bean with fennouil intercroppinge0
Outcome
WPe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest value of WP was obtained from the interaction between irrigation treatment I3 and faba bean with fennouil intercropping.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1098 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend I1 irrigation with fennouil intercropping to save irrigation water and enhance water productivity.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Outcome
applying the interaction of I1 and faba bean with fennouil intercroppinge0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applying the interaction of I1 and faba bean with fennouil intercropping, because it saved significant amount of irrigation water and enhanced water productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1287 · show in text ↑

intercropping · physiology: water · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 18 positive, 5 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

irrigation · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

62 papers: 49 positive, 13 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

58 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

intercropping · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

73 papers: 59 positive, 14 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.