Abstract
V. faba cultivars including cv. Minica, Kristall, Alfred and Optica were grown with (a) full irrigation, or restricted irrigation (b) after the start of flowering, (c) after the end of flowering, (d) before flowering or (e) during flowering. Irrigation from the start of flowering stimulated vegetative growth but reduced initial reproductive growth and final seed yield compared with restricted water during flowering only. In 1982-84 using cv. Minica, treatment (e) gave high av. seed yields (7 t/ha), optimum harvest index (0.61 g/g) and a relatively small range of seed yields (2.2 t/ha), while (d) gave 7.1 t/ha, lower harvest index (0.57) and a small range of seed yields (1.4 t/ha). The other treatments and no irrigation gave much lower seed yields and a larger range of seed yields. Treatment (c) gave the lowest harvest index. Similar results were obtained with cv. Alfred. It was concluded that the amount and distribution of rainfall was a major reason for variability in seed yield of this crop. (Abstract retrieved from CAB Abstracts by CABI’s permission)
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation from the start of flowering stimulated vegetative growth of Vicia faba.
- Taxon
- Vicia faba L.
Vicia fabat0 - Treatment
- Irrigation from the start of floweringe1
- Outcome
- vegetative growthe1
- Direction
- stimulatede1
- Comparator
- restricted water during flowering onlye1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Vicia faba L.”
e1“Irrigation from the start of flowering stimulated vegetative growth but reduced initial reproductive growth and final seed yield compared with restricted water during flowering only”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation from the start of flowering reduced initial reproductive growth of Vicia faba.
- Taxon
- Vicia faba L.Vicia fabat0
- Treatment
- Irrigation from the start of floweringe1
- Outcome
- initial reproductive growthe1
- Direction
- reducede1
- Comparator
- restricted water during flowering onlye1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Vicia faba L.”
e1“Irrigation from the start of flowering stimulated vegetative growth but reduced initial reproductive growth and final seed yield compared with restricted water during flowering only”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation from the start of flowering reduced final seed yield of Vicia faba.
- Taxon
- Vicia faba L.Vicia fabat0
- Treatment
- Irrigation from the start of floweringe1
- Outcome
- final seed yielde1
- Direction
- reducede1
- Comparator
- restricted water during flowering onlye1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Vicia faba L.”
e1“Irrigation from the start of flowering stimulated vegetative growth but reduced initial reproductive growth and final seed yield compared with restricted water during flowering only”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment (e) gave high average seed yield of 7 t/ha in cv. Minica.
- Taxon
- Vicia faba L.Vicia fabat0
- Material
- cv. Minicae4
- Treatment
- treatment (e)e2
- Outcome
- av. seed yieldse2
- Direction
- highe2
- Value
- 7 t/hae2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Vicia faba L.”
e2“treatment (e) gave high av. seed yields (7 t/ha), optimum harvest index (0.61 g/g) and a relatively small range of seed yields (2.2 t/ha)”
e4“In 1982-84 using cv. Minica”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment (e) gave optimum harvest index of 0.61 g/g.
- Taxon
- Vicia faba L.Vicia fabat0
- Treatment
- treatment (e)e2
- Outcome
- harvest indexe2
- Direction
- optimume2
- Value
- 0.61 g/ge2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Vicia faba L.”
e2“treatment (e) gave high av. seed yields (7 t/ha), optimum harvest index (0.61 g/g) and a relatively small range of seed yields (2.2 t/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment (e) gave a relatively small range of seed yields (2.2 t/ha).
- Taxon
- Vicia faba L.Vicia fabat0
- Treatment
- treatment (e)e2
- Outcome
- range of seed yieldse2
- Direction
- relatively smalle2
- Value
- 2.2 t/hae2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Vicia faba L.”
e2“treatment (e) gave high av. seed yields (7 t/ha), optimum harvest index (0.61 g/g) and a relatively small range of seed yields (2.2 t/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment (d) gave seed yield of 7.1 t/ha.
- Taxon
- Vicia faba L.Vicia fabat0
- Treatment
- (d)e3
- Outcome
- seed yieldse3
- Value
- 7.1 t/hae3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Vicia faba L.”
e3“while (d) gave 7.1 t/ha, lower harvest index (0.57) and a small range of seed yields (1.4 t/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment (d) gave a lower harvest index (0.57) than treatment (e).
- Taxon
- Vicia faba L.Vicia fabat0
- Treatment
- (d)e3
- Outcome
- harvest indexe3
- Direction
- lowere3
- Value
- 0.57e3
- Comparator
- treatment (e)e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Vicia faba L.”
e2“treatment (e) gave high av. seed yields (7 t/ha), optimum harvest index (0.61 g/g) and a relatively small range of seed yields (2.2 t/ha)”
e3“while (d) gave 7.1 t/ha, lower harvest index (0.57) and a small range of seed yields (1.4 t/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment (d) gave a small range of seed yields (1.4 t/ha).
- Taxon
- Vicia faba L.Vicia fabat0
- Treatment
- (d)e3
- Outcome
- range of seed yieldse3
- Direction
- smalle3
- Value
- 1.4 t/hae3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Vicia faba L.”
e3“while (d) gave 7.1 t/ha, lower harvest index (0.57) and a small range of seed yields (1.4 t/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment (c) gave the lowest harvest index.
- Taxon
- Vicia faba L.Vicia fabat0
- Treatment
- Treatment (c)e5
- Outcome
- harvest indexe5
- Direction
- loweste5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Vicia faba L.”
e5“Treatment (c) gave the lowest harvest index”
Claim · model-written summary
The other treatments and no irrigation gave much lower seed yields.
- Taxon
- Vicia faba L.Vicia fabat0
- Treatment
- The other treatments and no irrigatione6
- Outcome
- seed yieldse6
- Direction
- much lowere6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Vicia faba L.”
e6“The other treatments and no irrigation gave much lower seed yields and a larger range of seed yields”
Claim · model-written summary
The other treatments and no irrigation gave a larger range of seed yields.
- Taxon
- Vicia faba L.Vicia fabat0
- Treatment
- The other treatments and no irrigatione6
- Outcome
- range of seed yieldse6
- Direction
- largere6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Vicia faba L.”
e6“The other treatments and no irrigation gave much lower seed yields and a larger range of seed yields”
Claim · model-written summary
Rainfall amount and distribution were a major reason for variability in seed yield.
- Taxon
- Vicia faba L.Vicia fabat0
- Outcome
- variability in seed yielde7
- Qualifier
- the amount and distribution of rainfalle7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Vicia faba L.”
e7“the amount and distribution of rainfall was a major reason for variability in seed yield of this crop”
Claim · model-written summary
Cultivar Alfred gave similar results to cv. Minica.
- Taxon
- Vicia faba L.Vicia fabat0
- Material
- cv. Alfrede0
- Outcome
- Similar resultse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Vicia faba L.”
e0“Similar results were obtained with cv. Alfred”
The same questions in other papers
stage · growth · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
stage · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →irrigation · growth · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
29 papers more in this group
See all 33 papers →irrigation · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
58 papers more in this group
See all 62 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.