Paper · 2011 · AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF BASIC AND APPLIED SCIENCES

Use of Silicate and Different Cultivation Practices in Alleviating Salt Stress Effect on Bean Plants

Nesreen H. Abou‐Baker; M. Abd-Eladl; Mohsen M. Abbas

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
49
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was cultivated with faba bean on saline soil of 7.5 dS/m, where the following treatments were applied: 1) three cultivation practices (Furrow with mulch, furrow without mulch and line), 2) five foliar applications (potassium silicate, magnesium silicate, potassium sulfate and magnesium sulfate) and control. Moreover, the interaction between treatments was also considered. The results showed that furrow with mulch method had a major effect compared to other cultivation methods on shoot height (cm), root length (cm), shoot dry weight (g) and root dry weight (g) at 70 and 90 days after sowing and on straw weight (g/plant), root weight (g/plant), basic branch, pods number/plant, pods weight and seed yield (g/plant and kg/fed.) at harvesting. All measured parameters were significantly increased by silicon solutions as compared with sulphate solutions, although potassium silicate was the best. Magnesium silicate solution gave the highest values of N% and P% in contrast to K2SiO4 which gave the highest K% values in plant tissue. Generally, furrow method reduced the salinity on sides of ridge, salts moved from sides towards top of ridge. Furrow with mulch treatment decreased soil salinity more than other cultivation practices, so it is the best practice to avoid salinity hazard in salt affected soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Furrow with mulch had the largest effect on shoot height, root length, and shoot and root dry weight at 70 and 90 days.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae1
Treatment
furrow with mulch methode0
Outcome
shoot height (cm), root length (cm), shoot dry weight (g) and root dry weight (g)e0
Qualifier
70 and 90 days after sowinge0
Comparator
other cultivation methodse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“furrow with mulch method had a major effect compared to other cultivation methods on shoot height (cm), root length (cm), shoot dry weight (g) and root dry weight (g) at 70 and 90 days after sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–615 · show in text ↑
e1

“faba bean on saline soil of 7.5 dS/m”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Furrow with mulch had a major effect on straw and root weight, branches, pods and seed yield at harvest.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae1
Treatment
furrow with mulch methode0
Outcome
straw weight (g/plant), root weight (g/plant), basic branch, pods number/plant, pods weight and seed yield (g/plant and kg/fed.)e0
Comparator
other cultivation methodse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“furrow with mulch method had a major effect compared to other cultivation methods on shoot height (cm), root length (cm), shoot dry weight (g) and root dry weight (g) at 70 and 90 days after sowing and on straw weight (g/plant), root weight (g/plant), basic branch, pods number/plant, pods weight and seed yield (g/plant and kg/fed.) at harvesting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–765 · show in text ↑
e1

“faba bean on saline soil of 7.5 dS/m”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon solutions significantly increased measured parameters compared with sulfate solutions, with potassium silicate best.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae1
Treatment
silicon solutionse0
Outcome
All measured parameterse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
potassium silicate was the beste0
Comparator
sulphate solutionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All measured parameters were significantly increased by silicon solutions as compared with sulphate solutions, although potassium silicate was the best”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–918 · show in text ↑
e1

“faba bean on saline soil of 7.5 dS/m”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnesium silicate gave the highest tissue nitrogen and phosphorus percentages.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae1
Treatment
Magnesium silicate solutione0
Outcome
N% and P%e0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Magnesium silicate solution gave the highest values of N% and P%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–984 · show in text ↑
e1

“faba bean on saline soil of 7.5 dS/m”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium silicate gave the highest plant tissue potassium percentage.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae1
Treatment
K2SiO4e0
Outcome
K% values in plant tissuee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“K2SiO4 which gave the highest K% values in plant tissue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1055 · show in text ↑
e1

“faba bean on saline soil of 7.5 dS/m”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Furrow cultivation reduced salinity at ridge sides as salts moved toward the top.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae1
Treatment
furrow methode0
Outcome
salinity on sides of ridgee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“furrow method reduced the salinity on sides of ridge, salts moved from sides towards top of ridge”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1165 · show in text ↑
e1

“faba bean on saline soil of 7.5 dS/m”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Furrow with mulch decreased soil salinity more than other practices.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae1
Treatment
Furrow with mulch treatmente0
Outcome
soil salinitye0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
other cultivation practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Furrow with mulch treatment decreased soil salinity more than other cultivation practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1256 · show in text ↑
e1

“faba bean on saline soil of 7.5 dS/m”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–75 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend furrow with mulch to avoid salinity hazard.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae2
Treatment
Furrow with mulch treatmente1
Outcome
best practice to avoid salinity hazard in salt affected soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it is the best practice to avoid salinity hazard in salt affected soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1332 · show in text ↑
e1

“Furrow with mulch treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1194 · show in text ↑
e2

“faba bean on saline soil of 7.5 dS/m”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–75 · show in text ↑

irrigation · soil: chemistry · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

mulching · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

irrigation · growth · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 16 positive, 17 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

irrigation · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

62 papers: 49 positive, 13 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

58 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

mulching · soil: chemistry · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mulching · growth · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.