Abstract
A pot experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of 3-methyl phenol and the rate of irrigation on water consumption and yield of wheat and faba-bean in monocropping and intercropping systems.Irrigation was done to keep soil water contents to be 45%,60% and 75% of field capacity at 3-methyl phenol concentration of 300 × 10-6 mol·kg-1.Results show that the total water consumption of wheat and faba-bean under intercropping is 12.87%～31.56% lower than that for wheat and faba-bean under monocropping.Allelopathic effect(AE) of 3-methyl phenol on water consumption of different crops is insignificant;but irrigation rate,and cropping pattern are significant correlated with total water consumption.3-methyl phenol negatively affects yield of wheat and faba-bean,but that effect on wheat is weakened by enhanced irrigation rate,while 3-methyl phenol AE on faba-bean yield under different irrigation rates is not significantly different.Both biological and economic yield of intercropping systems increases by 15.3%～37.41% and 5.98%～31.27% respectively,in comparison with monocropped wheat and faba-bean yield.Intercropping as well weakens the negative effect of 3-methyl phenol AE on faba-bean yield.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping reduced total water consumption of wheat and faba-bean by 12.87%～31.56% versus monocropping.
- Taxon
- wheat and faba-bean
Vicia faba
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- intercroppinge0
- Outcome
- total water consumptione0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Value
- 12.87%～31.56%e0
- Comparator
- monocroppinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“total water consumption of wheat and faba-bean under intercropping is 12.87%～31.56% lower than that for wheat and faba-bean under monocropping”
Claim · model-written summary
The allelopathic effect of 3-methyl phenol on water consumption was insignificant.
- Taxon
- wheat and faba-beanVicia fabaTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 3-methyl phenole0
- Outcome
- water consumptione0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Allelopathic effect(AE) of 3-methyl phenol on water consumption of different crops is insignificant”
t0“wheat and faba-bean”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation rate was significantly correlated with total water consumption.
- Taxon
- wheat and faba-beanVicia fabaTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- irrigation ratee0
- Outcome
- total water consumptione0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“irrigation rate,and cropping pattern are significant correlated with total water consumption”
t0“wheat and faba-bean”
Claim · model-written summary
Cropping pattern was significantly correlated with total water consumption.
- Taxon
- wheat and faba-beanVicia fabaTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- cropping patterne0
- Outcome
- total water consumptione0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“cropping pattern are significant correlated with total water consumption”
t0“wheat and faba-bean”
Claim · model-written summary
3-methyl phenol reduced wheat yield.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- 3-methyl phenole0
- Outcome
- yield of wheate0
- Direction
- negatively affectse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“3-methyl phenol negatively affects yield of wheat and faba-bean”
Claim · model-written summary
3-methyl phenol reduced faba-bean yield.
- Taxon
- faba-beanVicia fabae0
- Treatment
- 3-methyl phenole0
- Outcome
- yield of wheat and faba-beane0
- Direction
- negatively affectse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“3-methyl phenol negatively affects yield of wheat and faba-bean”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher irrigation weakened the negative effect of 3-methyl phenol on wheat yield.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- enhanced irrigation ratee0
- Outcome
- effect on wheate0
- Direction
- weakenede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“that effect on wheat is weakened by enhanced irrigation rate”
Claim · model-written summary
The allelopathic effect on faba-bean yield did not differ significantly across irrigation rates.
- Taxon
- faba-beanVicia fabae0
- Treatment
- different irrigation ratese0
- Outcome
- faba-bean yielde0
- Direction
- not significantly differente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“3-methyl phenol AE on faba-bean yield under different irrigation rates is not significantly different”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping increased biological yield by 15.3%～37.41% over monocropping.
- Taxon
- wheat and faba-beanVicia fabaTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- intercropping systemse0
- Outcome
- biologicale0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Value
- 15.3%～37.41%e0
- Comparator
- monocropped wheat and faba-beane0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“biological and economic yield of intercropping systems increases by 15.3%～37.41% and 5.98%～31.27% respectively,in comparison with monocropped wheat and faba-bean yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping increased economic yield by 5.98%～31.27% over monocropping.
- Taxon
- wheat and faba-beanVicia fabaTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- intercropping systemse0
- Outcome
- economic yielde0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Value
- 5.98%～31.27%e0
- Comparator
- monocropped wheat and faba-beane0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“biological and economic yield of intercropping systems increases by 15.3%～37.41% and 5.98%～31.27% respectively,in comparison with monocropped wheat and faba-bean yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping weakened the negative allelopathic effect of 3-methyl phenol on faba-bean yield.
- Taxon
- faba-beanVicia fabae0
- Treatment
- Intercroppinge0
- Outcome
- faba-bean yielde0
- Direction
- weakense0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Intercropping as well weakens the negative effect of 3-methyl phenol AE on faba-bean yield”
The same questions in other papers
m-cresol · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
m-cresol · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results differ
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
intercropping · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
130 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
185 papers more in this group
See all 189 papers →intercropping · physiology: water · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
irrigation · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →intercropping · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →intercropping · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results
58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
69 papers more in this group
See all 73 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.