Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Raising nitrogen increased plants at harvest by 4.05 thousand plants/fed in the first season.

A claim from EFFECT OF NITROGEN RATES AND ITS TIME OF APPLICATION ON PRODUCTIVITY OF SUGAR BEET UNDER SPRINKLE IRRIGATION IN NEWLY RECLAIMED SOILS · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising nitrogen increased plants at harvest by 4.05 thousand plants/fed in the first season.

Treatment
160 kg N/fede0
Outcome
number of plants at harveste0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4.05e0
Comparator
100e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing N rates from 100 up to 160 kg N/fed significantly increased root weight by 16.52% and 24.77%, number of plants at harvest by 4.05 and 2.89 thousand plants/fed and root yield by 7.22 and 8.34 tons/fed in the first and second seasons, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–1081
t0

“EFFECT OF NITROGEN RATES AND ITS TIME OF APPLICATION ON PRODUCTIVITY OF SUGAR BEET UNDER SPRINKLE IRRIGATION IN NEWLY RECLAIMED SOILS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–133

Title

EFFECT OF NITROGEN RATES AND ITS TIME OF APPLICATION ON PRODUCTIVITY OF SUGAR BEET UNDER SPRINKLE IRRIGATION IN NEWLY RECLAIMED SOILS

E. Mahmoud; M. Masri Journal of Plant Production 2009. doi:10.21608/jpp.2009.118855

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-b56c4332565d05be4242e5ca5d24f87e7651a2129d53e1ab6be5c4ecbc4282b8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 142 positive, 19 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this claim · 16 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

152 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.