Claim · model-written summary
Groundnut flowers continued to appear in short days but not in long days.
- Taxon
- groundnut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- shorte2
- Outcome
- flowerse2
- Direction
- continued to appeare2
- Comparator
- longe2
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Cv. NC Ac 17090”
e2“Thereafter flowers continued to appear in short, but not in long, days”
Title
Marie-Luise Flohr; J. H. Williams; F. Lenz Experimental Agriculture 1990. doi:10.1017/s0014479700003604
Other claims from this paper (5)
- Intervention effect Photoperiod did not influence the thermal time to flowering of groundnut relative to natural daylength.
- Intervention effect Long days increased the thermal time between pod initiation and pod formation in groundnut.
- Intervention effect Long days increased the thermal time required for each groundnut fruit to mature.
- Intervention effect Partitioning of assimilates to pods was substantially lower in long days than in short days in groundnut.
- Association Pod initiation rate, partitioning coefficient and thermal time to pod maturity in groundnut were related to mean daylength.