Claim · model-written summary
The authors advise against calibration by identifying billet hits thrown at the hood.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“Calibrating the cane loss monitor by identifying ‘billet hits’ from the monitor when billets are thrown at the hood, which has previously been recommended, is not considered a good procedure.”
t0“CANE”
Title
EVALUATION OF CANE LOSS MONITORING SYSTEMS By
C. Whiteing; Roger J. Davis; E. Schmidt; et al. 2004
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Method / resource Neither sensor distinguished actual billet hits.
- Association Sensor signal output was unrelated to the number of billet hits.
- Observation Trash and tops dominated sensor response relative to cane billets.
- Method / resource Both systems predicted mass material flow and cane loss through the extractor fan very well.
- Association Total cane and trash flow measured by the sensors was directly related to cane loss.
- Recommendation The authors prefer a calibration equation integrating sensor signal over time.