Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Simulated climate change decreased vine production of Vitis vinifera compared with unmanipulated vines.

A claim from Simulated climate change in a Mediterranean organic vineyard altered the plant physiology and decreased the vine production · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated climate change decreased vine production of Vitis vinifera compared with unmanipulated vines.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Treatment
Simulated climate changet0
Outcome
vine productiont0
Direction
decreasedt0
Comparator
Vines without either top chambers or rainout shelterse3
Setting
Southeastern Spain (Jumilla, Murcia)e2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Vitis vinifera cv “Monastrell””

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–135
e2

“managed organically in Southeastern Spain (Jumilla, Murcia)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–220
e3

“Vines without either top chambers or rainout shelters were considered as control (C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–526
t0

“Simulated climate change in a Mediterranean organic vineyard altered the plant physiology and decreased the vine production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–123

Title

Simulated climate change in a Mediterranean organic vineyard altered the plant physiology and decreased the vine production

Open GPB 2024 2024. doi:10.58233/x8dqqugy

Other claims from this paper (1)

Record rev-b80040ddf05ff67bbd660811bed0e06d96e73e63fa2e3c2e203f9a92d705f728 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

climate site · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. no effect
    Light during ripening did not significantly affect MIBP at harvest.

    Fruit ripening in Vitis vinifera: light intensity before and not during ripening determines the concentration of 2‐methoxy‐3‐isobutylpyrazine in Cabernet Sauvignon berries · 2012

    Same direction

  2. negative
    Water deficits during the early season tended to affect yield more negatively than deficits applied between pea size and harvest.

    Responses of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Sultanina to Water Deficits During Various Pre- and Post-Harvest Phases Under Semi-Arid Conditions · 2017 · compared with deficits applied between pea size and harvest (TS and T6)

    Same direction

  3. no effect
    Commercial fruit yield of grapevine remained unaffected by high environmental B levels.

    Boron Toxicity in Grapevine · 2006

    Same direction

See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.