Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Glufosinate or its mixtures did not reduce cotton yield.

A claim from Weed Control and Crop Response to Glufosinate Applied to ‘PHY 485 WRF’ Cotton · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glufosinate or its mixtures did not reduce cotton yield.

Treatment
glufosinate or glufosinate mixturese0
Outcome
cotton yieldse0
Direction
not reducede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–77
e0

“cotton yields were not reduced by glufosinate or glufosinate mixtures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1031

Title

Weed Control and Crop Response to Glufosinate Applied to ‘PHY 485 WRF’ Cotton

A. Stanley Culpepper; Alan C. York; Phillip Roberts; et al. Weed Technology 2009. doi:10.1614/wt-08-168.1

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-b8b2df4671a3a83caf092c50b0da121016753cec4a06c3dcb2b7aa9145b8ea9c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

glufosinate · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

18 papers: 8 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.