Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Soybean sown under no tillage had a significantly higher number of pods per plant (41.6) than on ploughed land.

A claim from Effect of tillage method on Fusarium blight severity and yield of soybean in Omu-Aran, Southern Guinea Savannah of Nigeria · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean sown under no tillage had a significantly higher number of pods per plant (41.6) than on ploughed land.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe2
Treatment
sown under no tillagee2
Outcome
number of pods per plante2
Direction
highere2
Value
41.6e2
Comparator
ploughed lande2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Soybean sown under no tillage produced significantly (P<0.05) higher number of pods per plant (41.6) while the lowest pod number (23.3) were produced on soybean sown on ploughed land”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1400

Title

Effect of tillage method on Fusarium blight severity and yield of soybean in Omu-Aran, Southern Guinea Savannah of Nigeria

Joseph Abiodun; Ajibola Aluko Patrick; Oluwafemi Ademiluyi Benson; et al. African Journal of Agricultural Research 2016. doi:10.5897/ajar2015.10534

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-b91c7f590ebf9201fc583f8213af47f53071651a5b33249aa213f1a97b3684b7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

263 papers in the same direction as this claim · 100 in the opposite direction · 26 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Soybean yields were similar under conventional and no tillage.

    Cover crop, tillage, and herbicide effects on weeds, soil properties, microbial populations, and soybean yield · 2003 · compared with NT

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    The seedbed tillage method and herbicide treatments did not significantly affect soybean yields in 1976.

    Seedbed Tillage and Herbicide Influence on Soybean (Glycine max) Weed Control and Yield · 1979

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Average no-till yields of soybean were similar to conventional tillage yields.

    Corn/Soybean Rotation Effect as Influenced by Tillage, Nitrogen, and Hybrid/Cultivar · 1991 · compared with CT

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Twenty-year mean soybean yield was reduced by 4 to 7% under chisel, ridge and no-till systems in both rotation and monoculture compared with plowing.

    Effect of Tillage and Rotation on Agronomic Performance of Corn and Soybean: Twenty‐Year Study on Dark Silty Clay Loam Soil · 1996 · compared with plowing

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Tillage systems did not significantly affect soybean yield in rotation.

    Tillage for Continuous Corn and Corn-Soybean Rotation · 1982

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Soybean yield was not affected by tillage systems under weed-free conditions.

    Influence of Tillage Systems on Annual Weed Densities and Control in Solid-seeded Soybean (Glycine max) · 1990

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    No-till yielded 1.1 t ha−1, lower than reduced tillage.

    Weed Control Using Conventional Tillage, Reduced Tillage, No-Tillage, and Cover Crops in Organic Soybean · 2017 · compared with RT

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    No tillage had reduced grain yields, indicating lower carbon inputs.

    Carbon and Nitrogen Storage are Greater under Biennial Tillage in a Minnesota Corn–Soybean Rotation · 2006

    Opposite direction

381 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.