Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Cane weight and leaf area were greatest at 125% recommended dose of water soluble fertilizer versus straight fertilizer.

A claim from Influence of liquid fertilizers through drip irrigation on growth and yield of Suru sugarcane. · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cane weight and leaf area were greatest at 125% recommended dose of water soluble fertilizer versus straight fertilizer.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
125% RD of RWSFe0
Outcome
weight/cane and leaf areae0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
SFe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“weight/cane and leaf area were found to be maximum in 125% RD of RWSF as compared to SF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–717
t0

“Suru sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–93

Title

Influence of liquid fertilizers through drip irrigation on growth and yield of Suru sugarcane.

B. C. Chaudhari; V. N. Patil; P. L. Patel AN ASIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE 2010

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-b9838f0691efe8d455be504e5366ff0adc45a0053e71958a6e5f5072b52c1f56 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

fertilization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 129 positive, 18 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this claim · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Within-row compost significantly reduced root surface area versus control.

    Gypsum and Compost Effects on Sugarcane Root Growth, Yield, and Plant Nutrients · 2002 · compared with the control

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Municipal waste composts had no effect or harmed sugarcane growth.

    Organic Material Soil Amendment Effects on Root Rot and Sugarcane Growth and Characterization of the Materials · 1999

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Planting fertilizer percentages did not increase tillering at Morrinhos-GO.

    Yield and biometry of fertilized sugar cane with organomineral fertilizer of sewage sludge and biostimulant · 2020

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Field fresh weight was comparable across nitrogen treatments.

    Impact of urea fertilization rates on nitrogen losses, productivity and profitability in East African sugarcane plantations · 2024

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Green manuring reduced sugarcane biomass accumulation by 7 to 16%.

    Effect of intercropped prickly sesban (Sesbania cannabina) green-manure and nitrogen levels on growth and yield of sugarcane. · 2003

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Fertilizer combinations did not significantly affect germination, CCS or sugar recovery.

    Comparative efficiency of solid and liquid fertilizers in sugarcane · 2009

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Grower habitual fertilizer was the costliest and had inferior germination.

    Fertilizer Effects on Mechanization Wide Row Spacing Sugarcane · 2009

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Different manure applications had no significant effect on sugarcane growth height and stem diameter.

    Effects of Sugarcane Intercropping with Potato on the Sugarcane Yield and Quality · 2013

    Opposite direction

138 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.