Claim · model-written summary
Genotypes differed in their recovery responses after flooding.
- Taxon
- lentil
Lens culinarist0 - Outcome
- responded differently to floodinge0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the genotypes responded differently to flooding onward during recovery period”
t0“Lentil”
Title
Soil Flooding Tolerance in Lentil at Vegetative Stage
B Nessa; MR Islam; MM Haque; et al. Progressive Agriculture 2013. doi:10.3329/pa.v18i2.17460
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect Flooding considerably reduced genotype growth rates.
- Intervention effect Flooding promoted leaf senescence and desiccation.
- Intervention effect Flooding damaged the root system, though some genotypes recovered.
- Observation Flooding affected stems less than other components.
- Intervention effect Shoot growth was reduced 76-86% versus control.
- Observation Relative growth rates were negative during flooding and ranged negative to positive in recovery.
- Observation BINAmasur1 and BD3859 were comparatively more flooding-tolerant.
- Observation ILL5133 and ILL5087 were flooding-susceptible with negative tolerance indices.