Associationmodel-written summary

The combination with Jequitibá (Cariniana legalis) maintained more stable coffee yields.

A claim from Agroecological Transition of Conilon Coffee ( Coffea canephora ) Agroforestry Systems in the State of Espírito Santo, Brazil · 2013

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination with Jequitibá (Cariniana legalis) maintained more stable coffee yields.

Taxon
Coffea canephoraCoffea canephorat0
Interactor
Cariniana legalisCariniana legalise0other
Outcome
yieldse4
Direction
maintained more stablee4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea canephora
Coffea canephora · TaxonKsd5 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cariniana legalis
Cariniana legalis · InteractorLuciana Serra · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Agroecological Transition of Conilon Coffee ( Coffea canephora ) Agroforestry Systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–85
e0

“a field investigation that tested production of Coffea canephora with the shade trees Australian Cedar (Toona ciliata), Jequitibá (Cariniana legalis), and Teak (Tectona grandis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–560
e4

“Cedar was the shade tree that grew most and reduced coffee production, while the combination with Jequitibá maintained more stable yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–955

Title

Agroecological Transition of Conilon Coffee ( Coffea canephora ) Agroforestry Systems in the State of Espírito Santo, Brazil

Eduardo Ferreira Sales; V. Ernesto Méndez; Francisco Roberto Caporal; et al. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 2013. doi:10.1080/10440046.2012.712633

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-bacaa76a2cafd96a6a70a900c109b0fded28133c89b5314a19d16880d0fdda53 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer