Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Excising tips of a seminal and four crown roots barely influenced growth and third-leaf emergence.

A claim from The Role of Crown Roots from Coleoptilar Node in the Rooting and Development of Transplanted Rice Nursling Seedlings. · 1997

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excising tips of a seminal and four crown roots barely influenced growth and third-leaf emergence.

Treatment
excision of the root tips of a seminal root and four crown rootse0
Outcome
growth of transplanted seedlings, including the emergence rate of the third leafe0
Direction
barely influencede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth of transplanted seedlings, including the emergence rate of the third leaf, was barely influenced by excision of the root tips of a seminal root and four crown roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–685
t0

“Rice Nursling Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–116

Title

The Role of Crown Roots from Coleoptilar Node in the Rooting and Development of Transplanted Rice Nursling Seedlings.

Ryouji SASAKI; Kiyochika HOSHIKAWA Japanese Journal of Crop Science 1997. doi:10.1626/jcs.66.259

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-bbaee8b2b20982914bfdb4253d818aebabc41d11008bd35f2b8c86078cc06bf5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

crown compound · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.