Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Broadleaf weed control did not differ significantly among three higher fomesafen rates.

A claim from Evaluation of Fomesafen for Broadleaf Weed Control, In Soybeans (Glycine Max) · 1988

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadleaf weed control did not differ significantly among three higher fomesafen rates.

Taxon
SoybeansGlycine maxt0
Treatment
0.14, 0.28 and 0.35 kg ai/ha of fomesafene0
Interactor
broadleaf weede0weed
Outcome
broadleaf weed controle0
Direction
no significant differencese0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Soybeans (Glycine Max)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–77
e0

“no significant differences in broadleaf weed control in treatments which received 0.14, 0.28 and 0.35 kg ai/ha of fomesafen for either 1987 or 1988”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1692–1839

Title

Evaluation of Fomesafen for Broadleaf Weed Control, In Soybeans (Glycine Max)

Ricardo A. Jimenez TopSCHOLAR (Western Kentucky University) 1988

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-bbf8e5e4e8b3943af15603d7ad72b70501e534338cfd38e0d80cde834e26ebed · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

fomesafen · weed · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 20 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.