Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Azospirillum brasilense R1 increased grain weight by 39.5%.

A claim from RESPONSE OF RICE TO INOCULATION WITH PLANT GROWTH PROMOTING RHIZOBACTERIA IN CONTROL LAB ENVIRONMENT AND FIELD EXPERIMENT · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azospirillum brasilense R1 increased grain weight by 39.5%.

Treatment
Azospirillum brasilense R1e0
Interactor
Azospirillum brasilense R1Azospirillum brasilensee0symbiont
Outcome
grain weighte0
Direction
increasee0
Value
39.5%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Azospirillum brasilense R1 was more effective in plant growth promotion than other strains and showed 19% increase in the straw weight and 39.5% increase in grain weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–699
e1

“rice variety JP-5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–132

Title

RESPONSE OF RICE TO INOCULATION WITH PLANT GROWTH PROMOTING RHIZOBACTERIA IN CONTROL LAB ENVIRONMENT AND FIELD EXPERIMENT

Bashir Ahmed; M. S. Mirza; Dir Upper 2014

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-bc3deb398372acaafbcf8dd1c2f12e4dac6ac875fe5a922179f7c72d860ba110 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

Azospirillum brasilense · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

19 papers: 16 positive, 3 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.