Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Intercropping reduced maize forage yield versus monoculture.

A claim from Effect of Planting Sequence and Time, and Nitrogen on Maize Legume Intercrop Yield · 1988

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduced maize forage yield versus monoculture.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Intercroppinge0
Outcome
forage yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
maize in monoculturee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping (average of all treatments) reduced maize grain and forage yields compared to maize in monoculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–876

Title

Effect of Planting Sequence and Time, and Nitrogen on Maize Legume Intercrop Yield

W. B. Bryan; S. A. Peprah Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 1988. doi:10.1111/j.1439-037x.1988.tb00638.x

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-bc439b60a86eda8598d4f9d7de7ed3837bdbdc8f0910b1ad025616b57d4133ac · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

intercropping · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

834 papers: 613 positive, 221 negative or no effect

220 papers in the same direction as this claim · 613 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

825 papers more in this group

See all 834 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.