Claim · model-written summary
Biostimulant applications ameliorated the growth and physiological parameters of drought-stressed tomato seedlings.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- biostimulant applicationse1
- Interactor
- plant growth-promoting rhizobacteriae2symbiont
- Outcome
- these parameterse1
- Direction
- amelioratede1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“biostimulant applications ameliorated these parameters”
e2“biostimulants containing plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR)”
t0“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) seedlings”
Title
Metin Turan; Melek Ekinci; Sanem Argin; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2023. doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1211210
Other claims from this paper (19)
- Intervention effect The 4 L ha -1 biostimulant dose was the most effective for restoring plant growth under drought.
- Intervention effect Soil amendment with biostimulant enhanced soil organic matter and total N, P, Ca and Cu content.
- Intervention effect Water deficit decreased indole acetic acid (IAA) content of tomato seedlings by 83%.
- Intervention effect Water deficit decreased gibberellic acid (GA) content of tomato seedlings by 93%.
- Intervention effect Water deficit decreased salicylic acid (SA) content of tomato seedlings by 82%.
- Intervention effect Water deficit decreased cytokine content of tomato seedlings by 89%.
- Intervention effect Water deficit decreased zeatin content of tomato seedlings by 50%.
- Intervention effect Water deficit decreased jasmonic acid content of tomato seedlings by 57%.
- Intervention effect Water deficit decreased shoot fresh weight of tomato seedlings by 43%.
- Intervention effect Water deficit decreased root fresh weight of tomato seedlings by 19%.
- Intervention effect Water deficit decreased shoot dry weight of tomato seedlings by 39%.
- Intervention effect Water deficit decreased root dry weight of tomato seedlings by 29%.
- Intervention effect Water deficit decreased plant height of tomato seedlings by 20%.
- Intervention effect Water deficit decreased stem diameter of tomato seedlings by 18%.
- Intervention effect Water deficit decreased leaf area of tomato seedlings by 50%.
- Intervention effect Drought reduced LRWC of tomato seedlings by 21% compared with the control.
- Intervention effect Drought reduced chlorophyll a of tomato seedlings by 16% compared with the control.
- Intervention effect Drought reduced chlorophyll b of tomato seedlings by 21% compared with the control.
- Intervention effect Drought reduced total chlorophyll contents of tomato seedlings by 17% compared with the control.