Intervention effectmodel-written summary

At 125 kg/ha seed rate and 130% RDF, wheat had greater plant height.

A claim from Influence of seed rate and fertilizer levels on agro physiological parameters and yield of dual-purpose wheat (Triticum aestivum) · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 125 kg/ha seed rate and 130% RDF, wheat had greater plant height.

Treatment
125 kg/ha seed rate with 130% RDFe0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
115.92 and 113.01 cme0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher dry matter accumulation (320.88 and 295.87 g/m.r.l. at harvest), plant height (115.92 and 113.01 cm at harvest), LAI and total tillers was recorded in wheat sown at 125 kg/ha seed rate with 130% RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1536–1755

Title

Influence of seed rate and fertilizer levels on agro physiological parameters and yield of dual-purpose wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Harender Harender; V S Hooda; Amit Sodhi; et al. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2020. doi:10.56093/ijas.v90i9.106617

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-bcee85bc2c66dff16ee2528ec6355cf9d6884af147e18b4ba0f529d908a5fb0a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

density · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

110 papers: 81 positive, 29 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this claim · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

101 papers more in this group

See all 110 papers →

fertilization · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

755 papers: 663 positive, 92 negative or no effect

662 papers in the same direction as this claim · 89 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

746 papers more in this group

See all 755 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.