Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Twice hand weeding achieved 75.6% weed control efficiency.

A claim from Evaluation of Herbicides for the Management of Complex Weed Flora in French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under Mid Hill Conditions of Himachal Pradesh, India · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice hand weeding achieved 75.6% weed control efficiency.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
hand weeding (twice)e0
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
75.6 per cente0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest weed control efficiency of 75.6 per cent was obtained from hand weeding (twice) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1361
t0

“French Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–80

Title

Evaluation of Herbicides for the Management of Complex Weed Flora in French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under Mid Hill Conditions of Himachal Pradesh, India

Ketan; Sunil Kumar Gola; Shabnam Thakur; et al. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 2023. doi:10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i234246

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-bd305ec0d65ddc2bd749e3b56d37311994730eea64f7992bbae97bb5310240b2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

herbicide · weed · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 27 positive, 5 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Single pre or post application of herbicide did not control a broad spectrum of weeds and did not give commercially acceptable full-season control in field bean.

    Economic analysis of integrated weed management in field bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) · 2003

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Delaying irrigation until 8 DAT increased total weed dry weight by 52%.

    Weed control efficacy and dry bean response to preemergence herbicide incorporation timing · 2024

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    The herbicide did not affect the high density of annual gramineous weeds.

    Effectiveness and Selectivity of the Herbicide Diflufenikan in Common Bean · 2014

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Herbicide was ineffective against weeds.

    The combination of mineral fertilizer and herbicide on Ferralsol is it an alternative to increase the yield of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) by weed management in Lubumbashi, DR Congo? · 2014

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Herbicide mixtures and mulching did not substantially alter weed infestation.

    Integrated Weed Management in Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) at Wolaita Sodo, Southern Ethiopia · 2020

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Banded herbicides followed by shovel cultivation controlled weeds in snap bean.

    Efficacy of Mechanical Cultivation with and without Herbicides in Broccoli (Brassica oleracea), Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), and Sweet Corn (Zea mays) · 1999

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Herbicides alone effectively suppressed weeds at low weed densities.

    Weed Control and Dry Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) Response to In-Row Cultivation, Rotary Hoeing, and Herbicides1 · 2001

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Herbicides restricted weed density by 28% in early plantings.

    Predicting common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) productivity according to Rhizoctonia root and stem rot and weed development at field plot scale · 2022

    Same direction

23 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.