Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Evaluation of Herbicides for the Management of Complex Weed Flora in French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under Mid Hill Conditions of Himachal Pradesh, India

Ketan; Sunil Kumar Gola; Shabnam Thakur; et al.

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Experimental Farm of the Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, CSK HPKV, Palampur during Kharif, 2022 to study the effect of herbicide combinations for the management weeds in French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design with three replications and comprised of eleven weed control treatments viz., oxyfluorfen 150 g ha-1 (pre-emergence), pretilachlor 1000 g ha-1 (pre-emergence), imazethapyr 100 g ha-1 (pre-emergence), quizalofop- ethyl 100 g ha-1 ( pre-emergence), oxyfluorfen 100 g ha-1 (pre-emergence) fb quizalofop-ethyl 70 g ha-1 (post-emergence), pretilachlor 700 g ha-1 (pre-emergence) fb quizalofop-ethyl 70 g ha-1 (post-emergence), imazethapyr 70 g ha-1 (pre-emergence) fb quizalofop-ethyl 70 g ha-1 (post-emergence), pretilachlor 500 g ha-1 + imazethapyr 50 g ha-1 (pre-emergence) fb quizalofop-ethyl 50 g ha-1+ chlorimuron 3 g ha-1 (post-emergence), pretilachlor 500 g ha-1+ imazethapyr 50 g ha-1 (pre-emergence) fb HW, 2 HWs (30 and 45 DAS) and weedy check. Results of the study revealed that hand weeding (twice) and pretilachlor 500 g ha-1 + imazethapyr 50 g ha-1 (pre-emergence) fb HW effectively reduced weed count and dry matter of the weed species. Highest weed control efficiency of 75.6 per cent was obtained from hand weeding (twice) treatment followed by 63.7 per cent with pretilachlor 500 g ha-1 + imazethapyr 50 g ha-1 (pre-emergence) fb HW. The treatment, hand weeding (twice) also produced significantly higher pod yield (16.14 t/ha), gross (₹ 2, 83,795) and net (₹2, 66,732) returns due to weed control. Amongst herbicidal treatments, pretilachlor 500 g ha-1 + imazethapyr 50 g ha-1 (pre-emergence) fb HW proved best as it resulted in significantly higher pod yield (14.24 t/ha), gross (₹ 2, 38,006) and net (₹ 2, 31,129) returns due to weed control. The treatment, Imazethapyr 100 g ha-1 gave the highest marginal benefit cost ratio (MBCR) of 178.9.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice hand weeding reduced weed count and dry matter.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
hand weeding (twice)e0
Interactor
weed speciese0weed
Outcome
weed count and dry matter of the weed speciese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hand weeding (twice) and pretilachlor 500 g ha-1 + imazethapyr 50 g ha-1 (pre-emergence) fb HW effectively reduced weed count and dry matter of the weed species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1263 · show in text ↑
t0

“French Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pretilachlor plus imazethapyr followed by hand weeding reduced weed count and dry matter.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
pretilachlor 500 g ha-1 + imazethapyr 50 g ha-1 (pre-emergence) fb HWe0
Interactor
weed speciese0weed
Outcome
weed count and dry matter of the weed speciese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hand weeding (twice) and pretilachlor 500 g ha-1 + imazethapyr 50 g ha-1 (pre-emergence) fb HW effectively reduced weed count and dry matter of the weed species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1263 · show in text ↑
t0

“French Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice hand weeding achieved 75.6% weed control efficiency.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
hand weeding (twice)e0
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
75.6 per cente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest weed control efficiency of 75.6 per cent was obtained from hand weeding (twice) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1361 · show in text ↑
t0

“French Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The herbicide plus hand weeding treatment achieved 63.7% weed control efficiency.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
pretilachlor 500 g ha-1 + imazethapyr 50 g ha-1 (pre-emergence) fb HWe0
Outcome
weed control efficiencye1
Direction
followed bye0
Value
63.7 per cente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by 63.7 per cent with pretilachlor 500 g ha-1 + imazethapyr 50 g ha-1 (pre-emergence) fb HW.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1463 · show in text ↑
t0

“French Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“Highest weed control efficiency of 75.6 per cent was obtained from hand weeding (twice) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1361 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice hand weeding gave significantly higher pod yield of 16.14 t/ha.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
hand weeding (twice)e0
Outcome
pod yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
16.14 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hand weeding (twice) also produced significantly higher pod yield (16.14 t/ha), gross (₹ 2, 83,795) and net (₹2, 66,732) returns due to weed control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1479–1628 · show in text ↑
t0

“French Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice hand weeding gave gross returns of ₹ 2, 83,795.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
hand weeding (twice)e0
Outcome
grosse0
Direction
highere0
Value
₹ 2, 83,795e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hand weeding (twice) also produced significantly higher pod yield (16.14 t/ha), gross (₹ 2, 83,795) and net (₹2, 66,732) returns due to weed control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1479–1628 · show in text ↑
t0

“French Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice hand weeding gave net returns of ₹2, 66,732.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
hand weeding (twice)e0
Outcome
nete0
Direction
highere0
Value
₹2, 66,732e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hand weeding (twice) also produced significantly higher pod yield (16.14 t/ha), gross (₹ 2, 83,795) and net (₹2, 66,732) returns due to weed control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1479–1628 · show in text ↑
t0

“French Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The best herbicidal treatment gave 14.24 t/ha pod yield.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
pretilachlor 500 g ha-1 + imazethapyr 50 g ha-1 (pre-emergence) fb HWe0
Outcome
pod yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
14.24 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pretilachlor 500 g ha-1 + imazethapyr 50 g ha-1 (pre-emergence) fb HW proved best as it resulted in significantly higher pod yield (14.24 t/ha), gross (₹ 2, 38,006) and net (₹ 2, 31,129) returns due to weed control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1660–1875 · show in text ↑
t0

“French Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The best herbicidal treatment gave gross returns of ₹ 2, 38,006.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
pretilachlor 500 g ha-1 + imazethapyr 50 g ha-1 (pre-emergence) fb HWe0
Outcome
grosse0
Direction
highere0
Value
₹ 2, 38,006e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pretilachlor 500 g ha-1 + imazethapyr 50 g ha-1 (pre-emergence) fb HW proved best as it resulted in significantly higher pod yield (14.24 t/ha), gross (₹ 2, 38,006) and net (₹ 2, 31,129) returns due to weed control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1660–1875 · show in text ↑
t0

“French Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The best herbicidal treatment gave net returns of ₹ 2, 31,129.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
pretilachlor 500 g ha-1 + imazethapyr 50 g ha-1 (pre-emergence) fb HWe0
Outcome
nete0
Direction
highere0
Value
₹ 2, 31,129e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pretilachlor 500 g ha-1 + imazethapyr 50 g ha-1 (pre-emergence) fb HW proved best as it resulted in significantly higher pod yield (14.24 t/ha), gross (₹ 2, 38,006) and net (₹ 2, 31,129) returns due to weed control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1660–1875 · show in text ↑
t0

“French Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr gave the highest marginal benefit cost ratio, 178.9.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
Imazethapyr 100 g ha-1e0
Outcome
marginal benefit cost ratio (MBCR)e0
Direction
higheste0
Value
178.9e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imazethapyr 100 g ha-1 gave the highest marginal benefit cost ratio (MBCR) of 178.9.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1891–1975 · show in text ↑
t0

“French Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–80 · show in text ↑

Imazethapyr · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Imazethapyr · weed · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

herbicide · weed · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 27 positive, 5 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

herbicide · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 42 positive, 21 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.