Abstract
Imazethapyr at 0.07 and 0.10 kg ai ha -1 applied preplant incorporated (PPI), preemergence (PRE), and postemergence (POST) was evaluated at two locations in 1988 and 1989 for safety to dry edible beans. Bean stunting, leaf crinkling, and interveinal chlorosis were evident from imazethapyr and varied from 1 to 57%. Imazethapyr significantly reduced bean height and delayed maturity. PPI and POST applications of imazethapyr at 0.07 and 0.10 kg ha -1 did not reduce bean seed yields compared to yields of the untreated control. Bean cultivar by herbicide interactions were significant for bean injury but varied with year and location.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Imazethapyr caused bean stunting, leaf crinkling and interveinal chlorosis, with injury from 1 to 57%.
- Taxon
- Beane0
- Treatment
- imazethapyre0
- Outcome
- Bean stunting, leaf crinkling, and interveinal chlorosise0
- Value
- 1 to 57%e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“Bean stunting, leaf crinkling, and interveinal chlorosis were evident from imazethapyr and varied from 1 to 57%.”
Claim · model-written summary
Imazethapyr significantly reduced bean height.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Imazethapyr significantly reduced bean height and delayed maturity.”
Claim · model-written summary
Imazethapyr significantly delayed bean maturity.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Imazethapyr significantly reduced bean height and delayed maturity.”
Claim · model-written summary
PPI and POST imazethapyr at both tested rates did not reduce bean seed yield against untreated control.
Verbatim
e0“PPI and POST applications of imazethapyr at 0.07 and 0.10 kg ha -1 did not reduce bean seed yields compared to yields of the untreated control.”
Claim · model-written summary
Cultivar by herbicide interactions for bean injury were significant but varied by year and location.
- Taxon
- Beane0
- Material
- Bean cultivare0
- Treatment
- herbicidee0
- Outcome
- bean injurye0
- Qualifier
- varied with year and locatione0
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“Bean cultivar by herbicide interactions were significant for bean injury but varied with year and location.”
The same questions in other papers
Imazethapyr · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →Imazethapyr · physiology: pigments · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
Imazethapyr · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Imazethapyr · phenology · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- negative
- negative
herbicide · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
59 papers more in this group
See all 63 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.