Paper · 1995 · Weed Science

‘Olathe’ Pinto Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) Response to Postemergence Imazethapyr and Bentazon

Troy A. Bauer; Karen A. Renner; Donald Penner

13
claims
22
verbatim quotes
24
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Dry bean producers have limited postemergence broadleaf weed control options. The purpose of this research was to determine whether bentazon increased dry edible bean tolerance to postemergence imazethapyr applications. Imazethapyr and bentazon were applied with a petroleum oil adjuvant to ‘Olathe’ pinto bean in the field and greenhouse. Imazethapyr injured pinto bean 7 DAT in the field and greenhouse. Chlorophyll a content, a quantitative measure of bean chlorosis, decreased compared to the untreated control following imazethapyr application. When 840 g ha −1 of bentazon was tank-mixed with 53 g ha −1 of imazethapyr, bean injury decreased and chlorophyll a increased compared to imazethapyr alone. Fifty three g ha −1 of imazethapyr delayed physiological maturity by 8 and 15 d compared to the untreated control in 1991 and 1992, respectively. Pinto bean seed yields were not reduced compared to the untreated control. When 840 g ha −1 of bentazon was tank-mixed with 53 g ha −1 of imazethapyr, maturity was not delayed. 14 C-Imazethapyr absorption decreased by more than 40% and translocation of 14 C from the treated leaf decreased by more than 50% when 14 C-imazethapyr was tank-mixed with bentazon compared to 14 C-imazethapyr alone. The addition of 20 mM Na-acetate inhibited absorption of 14 C-imazethapyr, but did not inhibit translocation of 14 C. The decreased absorption and translocation of imazethapyr when tank-mixed with bentazon likely accounts for the safening effect observed in greenhouse and field studies.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr injured pinto bean 7 DAT in field and greenhouse.

Taxon
pinto beane0
Treatment
Imazethapyre0
Outcome
injurede0
Direction
injurede0
Qualifier
7 DATe0
Setting
field and greenhousee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Imazethapyr injured pinto bean 7 DAT in the field and greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–404 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr decreased chlorophyll a relative to untreated control.

Taxon
beane0
Treatment
imazethapyr applicatione0
Outcome
Chlorophyll a contente0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorophyll a content, a quantitative measure of bean chlorosis, decreased compared to the untreated control following imazethapyr application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–548 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bentazon tank mixing reduced bean injury relative to imazethapyr alone.

Taxon
beane0
Treatment
840 g ha −1 of bentazon was tank-mixed with 53 g ha −1 of imazethapyre0
Outcome
bean injurye0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
imazethapyr alonee0

Verbatim

e0

“When 840 g ha −1 of bentazon was tank-mixed with 53 g ha −1 of imazethapyr, bean injury decreased and chlorophyll a increased compared to imazethapyr alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–705 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bentazon tank mixing increased chlorophyll a relative to imazethapyr alone.

Taxon
beane0
Treatment
840 g ha −1 of bentazon was tank-mixed with 53 g ha −1 of imazethapyre0
Outcome
chlorophyll ae0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
imazethapyr alonee0

Verbatim

e0

“When 840 g ha −1 of bentazon was tank-mixed with 53 g ha −1 of imazethapyr, bean injury decreased and chlorophyll a increased compared to imazethapyr alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–705 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr delayed maturity by 8 days in 1991.

Taxon
Pinto Beant0
Treatment
Fifty three g ha −1 of imazethapyre0
Outcome
physiological maturitye0
Direction
delayede0
Value
8e0
Qualifier
1991e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Fifty three g ha −1 of imazethapyr delayed physiological maturity by 8 and 15 d compared to the untreated control in 1991 and 1992, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–851 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinto Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr delayed maturity by 15 days in 1992.

Taxon
Pinto Beant0
Treatment
Fifty three g ha −1 of imazethapyre0
Outcome
physiological maturitye0
Direction
delayede0
Value
15 de0
Qualifier
1992e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Fifty three g ha −1 of imazethapyr delayed physiological maturity by 8 and 15 d compared to the untreated control in 1991 and 1992, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–851 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinto Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pinto bean seed yield was not reduced relative to untreated control.

Taxon
Pinto beane0
Treatment
imazethapyre1
Outcome
seed yieldse0
Direction
not reducede0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Pinto bean seed yields were not reduced compared to the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–926 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fifty three g ha −1 of imazethapyr delayed physiological maturity by 8 and 15 d compared to the untreated control in 1991 and 1992, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–851 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bentazon tank mixing prevented a maturity delay.

Taxon
Pinto Beant0
Treatment
840 g ha −1 of bentazon was tank-mixed with 53 g ha −1 of imazethapyre0
Outcome
maturitye0
Direction
not delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“When 840 g ha −1 of bentazon was tank-mixed with 53 g ha −1 of imazethapyr, maturity was not delayed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1028 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinto Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bentazon tank mixing decreased 14 C-Imazethapyr absorption by more than 40%.

Taxon
Pinto Beant0
Treatment
14 C-imazethapyr was tank-mixed with bentazone0
Outcome
14 C-Imazethapyr absorptione0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
more than 40%e0
Comparator
14 C-imazethapyr alonee0

Verbatim

e0

“14 C-Imazethapyr absorption decreased by more than 40% and translocation of 14 C from the treated leaf decreased by more than 50% when 14 C-imazethapyr was tank-mixed with bentazon compared to 14 C-imazethapyr alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1245 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinto Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bentazon tank mixing decreased 14 C translocation from treated leaf by more than 50%.

Taxon
Pinto Beant0
Treatment
14 C-imazethapyr was tank-mixed with bentazone0
Outcome
translocation of 14 C from the treated leafe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
more than 50%e0
Comparator
14 C-imazethapyr alonee0

Verbatim

e0

“14 C-Imazethapyr absorption decreased by more than 40% and translocation of 14 C from the treated leaf decreased by more than 50% when 14 C-imazethapyr was tank-mixed with bentazon compared to 14 C-imazethapyr alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1245 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinto Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Na-acetate inhibited 14 C-imazethapyr absorption.

Taxon
Pinto Beant0
Treatment
20 mM Na-acetatee0
Outcome
absorption of 14 C-imazethapyre0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of 20 mM Na-acetate inhibited absorption of 14 C-imazethapyr, but did not inhibit translocation of 14 C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1363 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinto Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Na-acetate did not inhibit 14 C translocation.

Taxon
Pinto Beant0
Treatment
20 mM Na-acetatee0
Outcome
translocation of 14 Ce0
Direction
did not inhibite0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of 20 mM Na-acetate inhibited absorption of 14 C-imazethapyr, but did not inhibit translocation of 14 C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1363 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinto Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–19 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced absorption and translocation likely explain bentazon safening.

Taxon
Pinto Beant0
Treatment
bentazone0
Outcome
safening effecte0
Qualifier
decreased absorption and translocation of imazethapyre0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The decreased absorption and translocation of imazethapyr when tank-mixed with bentazon likely accounts for the safening effect observed in greenhouse and field studies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1365–1533 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinto Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–19 · show in text ↑

bentazone · physiology: pigments · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Imazethapyr · physiology: pigments · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Imazethapyr · crop injury · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

bentazone · crop injury · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.